Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31194728›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Disentangling juxtacrine from paracrine signalling in dynamic tissue.

Hiroshi Momiji, Kirsty L Hassall, Karen Featherstone, Anne V McNamara, Amanda L Patist, David G Spiller, Helen C Christian, Michael R H White, Julian R E Davis, Bärbel F Finkenstädt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hiroshi MomijiZeeman Institute for Systems Biology & Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Kirsty L HassallDepartment of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0033-1136
Karen FeatherstoneFaculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Anne V McNamaraSystems Microscopy Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Amanda L PatistFaculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
David G SpillerSystems Microscopy Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Helen C ChristianDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Michael R H WhiteSystems Microscopy Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Julian R E DavisFaculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0838-0557
Bärbel F FinkenstädtDepartment of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
David A RandZeeman Institute for Systems Biology & Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2217-3274

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K003097/1Medical Research Council MR/K015885/1Medical Research Council MR/M008908/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT091688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prolactin is a major hormone product of the pituitary gland, the central endocrine regulator. Despite its physiological importance, the cell-level mechanisms of prolactin production are not well understood. Having significantly improved the resolution of real-time-single-cell-GFP-imaging, the authors recently revealed that prolactin gene transcription is highly dynamic and stochastic yet shows space-time coordination in an intact tissue slice. However, it still remains an open question as to what kind of cellular communication mediates the observed space-time organization. To determine the type of interaction between cells we developed a statistical model. The degree of similarity between two expression time series was studied in terms of two distance measures, Euclidean and geodesic, the latter being a network-theoretic distance defined to be the minimal number of edges between nodes, and this was used to discriminate between juxtacrine from paracrine signalling. The analysis presented here suggests that juxtacrine signalling dominates. To further determine whether the coupling is coordinating transcription or post-transcriptional activities we used stochastic switch modelling to infer the transcriptional profiles of cells and estimated their similarity measures to deduce that their spatial cellular coordination involves coupling of transcription via juxtacrine signalling. We developed a computational model that involves an inter-cell juxtacrine coupling, yielding simulation results that show space-time coordination in the transcription level that is in agreement with the above analysis. The developed model is expected to serve as the prototype for the further study of tissue-level organised gene expression for epigenetically regulated genes, such as prolactin.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell CommunicationComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationHumansMaleParacrine CommunicationPituitary GlandProlactinRatsRats, TransgenicStochastic ProcessesProlactin

Identifiers

PMID31194728
PMCPMC6592563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.