Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31194517›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2019

Single Cell Proteomics by Data-Independent Acquisition To Study Embryonic Asymmetry in

Anumita Saha-Shah, Melody Esmaeili, Simone Sidoli, Hyojeong Hwang, Jing Yang, Peter S Klein, Benjamin A Garcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Subcellular mass spectrometry reveals proteome remodeling in an asymmetrically dividing (frog) embryonic stem cell.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Epigenomic dynamics of early Xenopus Embryos.Development, growth & differentiation · 2022
    Review
  16. Separation methods in single-cell proteomics: RPLC or CE?International journal of mass spectrometry · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anumita Saha-ShahEpigenetics Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania 19104 , United States.
Melody EsmaeiliCell and Molecular Biology Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania 19104 , United States.
Simone SidoliEpigenetics Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania 19104 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9073-6641
Hyojeong HwangDepartment of Comparative Biosciences , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 2001 South Lincoln Avenue, 3411 Veterinary Medicine Basic Sciences Building , Urbana , Illinois 61802 , United States.
Jing YangDepartment of Comparative Biosciences , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 2001 South Lincoln Avenue, 3411 Veterinary Medicine Basic Sciences Building , Urbana , Illinois 61802 , United States.
Peter S KleinCell and Molecular Biology Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania 19104 , United States.
Benjamin A GarciaEpigenetics Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania 19104 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2306-1207
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Shared Resources Core 2: Quantitative Proteomics CoreP01CA196539 · NCI · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI MUIR, TOM · 2015 to 2024
$17.6M
Viral modulation of epitranscriptomic mechanismsR01AI118891 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GARCIA, BENJAMIN A, WEITZMAN, MATTHEW D. · 2015 to 2025
$5.4M
Maternal control of germline developmentR35GM131810 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Jing Yang · 2019 to 2026
$3.2M
Maintenance and expansion of long-term hematopoietic stem cellsR01HL141759 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KLEIN, PETER S · 2018 to 2021
$2.2M
Regulation of Neurogenesis and Behavior by GSK-3R01MH100923 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KLEIN, PETER S · 2014 to 2017
$1.9M
Understanding the Role of Combinatorial Histone PTM PatternsR01GM110174 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GARCIA, BENJAMIN A · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
An unexpected signaling output for the tumor suppressor APCR01GM115517 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KLEIN, PETER S · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
Dnd1 and repression of transcription in primordial germ cellsR01GM111816 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI YANG, JING · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA196539NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141759NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118891NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110174NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111816NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115517NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131810NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Techniques that allow single cell analysis are gaining widespread attention, and most of these studies utilize genomics-based approaches. While nanofluidic technologies have enabled mass spectrometric analysis of single cells, these measurements have been limited to metabolomics and lipidomic studies. Single cell proteomics has the potential to improve our understanding of intercellular heterogeneity. However, this approach has faced challenges including limited sample availability, as well as a requirement of highly sensitive methods for sample collection, cleanup, and detection. We present a technique to overcome these limitations by combining a micropipette (pulled glass capillary) based sample collection strategy with offline sample preparation and nanoLC-MS/MS to analyze proteins through a bottom-up proteomic strategy. This study explores two types of proteomics data acquisition strategies namely data-dependent (DDA) and data-independent acquisition (DIA). Results from the study indicate DIA to be more sensitive enabling analysis of >1600 proteins from ∼130 μm

Indexed as

AnimalsEmbryo, NonmammalianProteomicsSingle-Cell AnalysisTandem Mass SpectrometryXenopus laevisXenopus ProteinsXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31194517
PMCPMC6688503
OpenAlexW2953124447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.