Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31194228›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2019

Single-Arm Phases 1 and 2 Trial of Niraparib in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Carcinoma.

Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos, Steven Waggoner, Gregory A Vidal, Monica Mita, John W Moroney, Robert Holloway, Linda Van Le, Jasgit C Sachdev, Eloise Chapman-Davis, Gerardo Colon-Otero and 15 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02657889 (Phase 1/2 Clinical Study of Niraparib in Combination With Pembrolizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 351 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
351citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
29.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02657889 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Phase 1/2 Clinical Study of Niraparib in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorTesaro, Inc.Ran2016 to 2021Enrolled122ConditionsNeoplasms, Triple Negative Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Breast CancerArmsniraparib, pembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

351 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 545 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

291 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 18 institutions in 2 countries.

Panagiotis A KonstantinopoulosDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Steven WaggonerDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio.
Gregory A VidalDivision of Medical Oncology, West Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Monica MitaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
John W MoroneySection of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Robert HollowayDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Florida Hospital Gynecologic Oncology, Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando.
Linda Van LeDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill.
Jasgit C SachdevDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Virginia G. Piper Cancer Center Clinical Trials, HonorHealth Research Institute, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Eloise Chapman-DavisWeill Cornell Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cornell University, New York, New York.
Gerardo Colon-OteroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Richard T PensonDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Ursula A MatulonisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Young Bae KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kathleen N MooreStephenson Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Elizabeth M SwisherDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Anniina FärkkiläDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Alan D'AndreaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Erica Stringer-ReasorDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Jing WangDepartment of Research & Early Development, TESARO: A GSK Company, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Nathan BuerstatteDepartment of Clinical Operations, TESARO: A GSK Company, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Sujata AroraDepartment of Biostatistics, TESARO: A GSK Company, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Julie R GrahamDepartment of Clinical Science, TESARO: A GSK Company, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Dmitri BobilevDepartment of Clinical Science, TESARO: A GSK Company, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Bruce J DezubeDepartment of Clinical Science, TESARO: A GSK Company, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Pamela MunsterHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center at Mount Zion, San Francisco.
Tesaro (United States) · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCornell University · USFlorida Hospital Cancer Institute · USHelsinki University Hospital · FIJacksonville College · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USSarah Cannon · USTranslational Genomics Research Institute · USTufts Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California San Francisco Medical Center · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity School · USWest Cancer Center · US

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePatients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma frequently develop resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy, at which time treatment options become limited.

objectiveTo evaluate the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor niraparib combined with pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThe TOPACIO/KEYNOTE-162 (Niraparib in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer or Ovarian Cancer) trial, an open-label, single-arm phases 1 and 2 study enrolled women with advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or recurrent ovarian carcinoma, irrespective of BRCA mutation status. Median follow-up was 12.4 months (range, 1.2 to ≥23.0 months). Data were collected from April 15, 2016, through September 4, 2018, with September 4, 2018, as a data cutoff, and analyzed from September 4, 2018, through January 30, 2019.

interventionsThe recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 200 mg of oral niraparib once daily and 200 mg of intravenous pembrolizumab on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary objectives of phase 1 were to evaluate dose-limiting toxic effects and establish the RP2D and dosing schedule. The primary objective of phase 2 was to assess objective response rate (ORR; complete plus partial responses). Results from the phase 1 ovarian carcinoma and TNBC cohorts and phase 2 ovarian carcinoma cohort are reported. Because of the similarity in the phase 1 and 2 ovarian carcinoma populations, the data were pooled to perform an integrated efficacy analysis.

resultsFourteen patients (9 with ovarian carcinoma and 5 with TNBC) in phase 1 and 53 patients with ovarian carcinoma in phase 2 were enrolled, for a pooled ovarian carcinoma cohort of 62 patients (median age, 60 years [range, 46-83 years]). In the integrated efficacy phases 1 and 2 ovarian carcinoma population (60 of 62 evaluable patients), ORR was 18% (90% CI, 11%-29%), with a disease control rate of 65% (90% CI, 54%-75%), including 3 (5%) with confirmed complete responses, 8 (13%) with confirmed partial responses, 28 (47%) with stable disease, and 20 (33%) with progressive disease. The ORRs were consistent across subgroups based on platinum-based chemotherapy sensitivity, previous bevacizumab treatment, or tumor BRCA or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) biomarker status. Median duration of response was not reached (range, 4.2 to ≥14.5 months). At data cutoff, 2 patients with a response and 1 patient with stable disease continued to receive treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Niraparib in combination with pembrolizumab is tolerable, with promising antitumor activity for patients with ovarian carcinoma who have limited treatment options regardless of platinum status, biomarker status, or prior treatment with bevacizumab. Responses in patients without tumor BRCA mutations or non-HRD cancers were higher than expected with either agent as monotherapy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02657889.

Identifiers

PMID31194228
PMCPMC6567832
OpenAlexW2952108487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.