Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31194081›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

The Mahaweli Development Project and the 'rendering technical' of agrarian development in Sri Lanka.

Kavindra Paranage

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kavindra ParanageSchool of Social Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mahaweli Development Project (MDP) is the largest irrigation-based agricultural development program in Sri Lanka and one of the largest agriculture-related programs in the world. However, despite promises of success and overly optimistic prognostications as to the future performance and potential of the MDP, the project has increasingly come under criticism in the new millennium for its failure to achieve intended irrigation targets and for its overall underperformance. The object of the present study is to critically evaluate the value-oriented narrative that has been put forward by planners of the MDP to explain these failures via a thorough examination of policy documents and on-site field research. This study finds that reasons cited by planners of the MDP to account for its underperformance, including a lack of motivation, knowledge and organization among farmers and the scarcity of water, are often technical in nature and that the official narrative selectively omits certain key questions related to political-economy. Using a theoretical framework shaped by the work of Tania Li and James Ferguson, the present work examines why the planners of development projects 'render technical' the problems related to program implementation and the implications of this tendency.

Indexed as

AgricultureAnti-politicsDevelopmentalismPolitical scienceRendering technicalSociologySri Lanka

Identifiers

PMID31194081
PMCPMC6551383
OpenAlexW2948504031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.