Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31194070›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)

Lysophosphatidic acid LPA

Hiroshi Ueda, Hiroyuki Neyama, Keita Sasaki, Chiho Miyama, Ryusei Iwamoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Lysophospholipid receptors in neurodegeneration and neuroprotection.Exploration of neuroprotective therapy · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The LPAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation Is Involved in LPAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  18. BMS-986020, a Specific LPAAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroshi UedaDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutic Innovation, Nagasaki University, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan.
Hiroyuki NeyamaDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutic Innovation, Nagasaki University, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan.
Keita SasakiDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutic Innovation, Nagasaki University, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan.
Chiho MiyamaDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutic Innovation, Nagasaki University, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan.
Ryusei IwamotoDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutic Innovation, Nagasaki University, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan.
Nagasaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a mouse model for central post-stroke pain (CPSP), a centrally-originated neuropathic pain (NeuP). In this mode, mice were first injected with Rose Bengal, followed by photo-irradiation of left middle cerebral artery (MCA) to generate thrombosis. Although the MCA thrombosis was soon dissolved, the reduced blood flow remained for more than 24 h due to subsequent occlusion of microvessels. This photochemically induced thrombosis (PIT) model showed a hypersensitivity to the electrical stimulation of both sides of paw, but did not show any abnormal pain in popular thermal or mechanical nociception tests. When tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) was injected 6 h after the PIT stress, tPA-dependent hypersensitivity to the electrical paw stimulation and stable thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia on both sides for more than 17 or 18 days after the PIT treatment. These hyperalgesic effects were abolished in lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 (LPA

Indexed as

Central poststroke painCPSP, central post-stroke painDMSO, dimethyl sulfoxideEPW, electrical stimulation-induced paw withdrawalHE, Hematoxylin and Eosini.v., intravenouslyLC–MS/MSLC–MS/MS, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometryLPA1-KO, LPA1-deficientLPA1, lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1LPA3, lysophosphatidic acid receptor 3Lysophosphatidic acidMCA, middle cerebral arteryMD, medial dorsal thalamusMRM, multiple reaction monitoringNeuP, neuropathic painPFA, paraformaldehydePhotochemically induced thrombosisPIT, photochemically induced thrombosispSNL, partial sciatic nerve ligationPWL, paw withdrawal latencyRB, Rose BengalS-I, sensory cortextMCAO, transient middle cerebral artery occlusiontPAtPA, tissue-type plasminogen activatorTTC, 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride

Identifiers

PMID31194070
PMCPMC6550111
OpenAlexW2883538125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.