Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31193921›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019

Participant recruitment into a community-based diabetes prevention trial in India: Learnings from the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program.

Thirunavukkarasu Sathish, Zahra Aziz, Pilvikki Absetz, Kavumpurathu Raman Thankappan, Robyn Jennifer Tapp, Sajitha Balachandran, Suman Surendra Shetty, Brian Oldenburg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Thirunavukkarasu SathishMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 235 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Zahra AzizMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 235 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Pilvikki AbsetzDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Kavumpurathu Raman ThankappanAchutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, 695011, Kerala, India.
Robyn Jennifer TappPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, United Kingdom.
Sajitha BalachandranAchutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, 695011, Kerala, India.
Suman Surendra ShettyMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 235 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Brian OldenburgMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 235 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUSree Chitra Thirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology · INSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

Building the Asian NCoD Research Network for Regional Research CapacityD43TW008332 · FIC · MONASH UNIVERSITY · PI FISHER, EDWIN B, KADIR, KHALID · 2010 to 2014
$1.0M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW008332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on participant recruitment into diabetes prevention trials are limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to provide a detailed analysis of participant recruitment into a community-based diabetes prevention trial in India.

methodsThe Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program was conducted in 60 polling areas (electoral divisions) of the Neyyatinkara taluk (subdistrict) in Trivandrum district, Kerala state. Individuals (age 30-60 years) were screened with the Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) at their homes followed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at community-based clinics. Individuals at high-risk of developing diabetes (IDRS score ≥60 and without diabetes on the OGTT) were recruited.

resultsA total of 1007 participants (47.2% women) were recruited over nine months. Pilot testing, personal contact and telephone reminders from community volunteers, and gender matching of staff were effective recruitment strategies. The major recruitment challenges were: (1) during home visits, one-third of potential participants could not be contacted, as they were away for work; and (2) men participated less frequently in the OGTT screening than women (75.2% vs. 84.2%). For non-participation, lack of time (42.0%) was most commonly cited followed by '

conclusionsThis study provides valuable information for future researchers planning to implement community-based diabetes prevention trials in India or other LMICs.

trial registrationAustralia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12611000262909.

Indexed as

ChallengesCostsDiabetesIndiaRecruitmentStaff time

Identifiers

PMID31193921
PMCPMC6545388
OpenAlexW2946358137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.