Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31193918›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2019

Predicting smokeless tobacco initiation and re-initiation in the United States Air Force.

Andrew Dunkle, Ryan Kalpinski, Jon Ebbert, Wayne Talcott, Robert Klesges, Melissa A Little

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. U.S. Military Tobacco and Nicotine Policy Lagging Behind the Times.American journal of preventive medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Nobody Views It As a Negative Thing to Smoke": A Qualitative Study of the Relationship Between United States Air Force Culture and Tobacco Use.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew DunkleWilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, United States of America.
Ryan KalpinskiWilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, United States of America.
Jon EbbertMayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Wayne TalcottUniversity of Virginia, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, United States of America.
Robert KlesgesUniversity of Virginia, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, United States of America.
Melissa A LittleUniversity of Virginia, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, United States of America.

Funding

New, Emerging, and Traditional Tobacco Use in the MilitaryR01DA037273 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KLESGES, ROBERT C · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
The Determinants of Tobacco Relapse and Initiation Following a Period of Forced Abstinence in the U.S. Military: A Social Ecological ApproachR01DA043468 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LITTLE, MELISSA ASHLEY · 2018 to 2023
$3.2M
Predictors of Smokeless Tobacco and Dual Use in the US MilitaryR01DA036510 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI KLESGES, ROBERT C · 2013 to 2014
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036510NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037273NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionActive Duty United States Air Force (USAF) members have substantially higher rates of smokeless tobacco (ST) use than the general population.

methodsWe longitudinally assessed demographics, tobacco use, intrapersonal factors, and interpersonal factors to determine associations with the initiation or re-initiation of ST in the year following a period of forced abstinence among 2188 newly recruited Airmen. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between baseline predictors and ST use at one-year follow-up.

resultsIn the final multivariate models compared to never users, the strongest predictors of ST use initiation after BMT were male gender (adjusted OR 8.93, 95% CI 3.82, 20.88), pre-BMT cigarette and cigar use (adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.00, 2.57; adjusted OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.66, 3.81 respectively). Compared to former ST users, the strongest predictors of re-initiation were male gender (adjusted OR 10.68, 95% CI 2.25, 50.62) and intentions to use ST (adjusted OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.42, 3.12). Compared to initiators of ST, the strongest predictors of re-initiation were intentions to use ST and peer use (adjusted OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.94, 5.49; OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.92, 3.41 respectively).

conclusionsOur results suggest that initiators may be exploring and viewing ST as a less harmful alternative to cigarette smoking and ST users reporting intentions to use ST in the future often return to use. The development of interventions able to disrupt the link between intentions to use tobacco and future tobacco use in the USAF is vital.

Identifiers

PMID31193918
PMCPMC6544562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.