Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31193799›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2019

Improving Maternal and Neonatal Health by a Midwife-led Continuity Model of Care - An Observational Study in One Governmental Hospital in Palestine.

Berit Mortensen, Marit Lieng, Lien My Diep, Mirjam Lukasse, Kefaya Atieh, Erik Fosse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice Behaviour of Midwives Concerning Periodontal Health of Pregnant Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Observational
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Berit MortensenThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, The Intervention Centre, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
Marit LiengInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lien My DiepOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mirjam LukasseFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Kefaya AtiehPalestinian Ministry of Health, Nablus, Palestine.
Erik FosseThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, The Intervention Centre, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrom 2013 a midwife-led continuity model of care was implemented in the Nablus region in occupied Palestine, involving a governmental hospital and ten rural villages. This study analysed the relation between the midwife-led model and maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

methodA register-based, retrospective cohort design was used, involving 2201 singleton births between January 2016 and June 2017 at Nablus governmental hospital. Data from rural women, with singleton pregnancies and mixed risk status, who either lived in villages that offered the midwife-led continuity model and had registered at the governmental clinic, or who lived in villages without the midwife-led model and received regular care, were compared. Primary outcome was unplanned caesarean section. Secondary outcomes were other modes of birth, postpartum anaemia, preterm birth, birth weight, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit.

findingsStatistically significant less women receiving the midwife-led model had unplanned caesarean sections, 12·8% vs 15·9%, adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0·80 (95% CI 0·64-0·99) and postpartum anaemia,19·8% vs 28·6%, aRR 0·72 (0·60-0·85). There was also a statistically significant lower rate of preterm births within the exposed group, 13·1% vs 16·8, aRR 0·79 (0·63-0·98), admission to neonatal intensive care unit, 7·0% vs 9·9%, aRR 0·71 (0·52-0·98) and newborn with birth weight 1500 g and less, 0·1% vs 1·1%, aRR 0·13 (0·02-0·97).

interpretationReceiving the midwife-led continuity model of care in Palestine was associated with several improved maternal and neonatal health outcomes. The findings support further implementation of the model. Implementation research, including randomised studies, would be useful to further investigate the effect and feasibility of the model in a low resource setting.

fundingThis study was partly funded by the Research Council of Norway through the Global Health and Vaccination Program (GLOBVAC), project number 243706. The implementation received public funding through Norwegian Aid Committee (NORWAC).

Indexed as

Continuity of careDeveloping countriesMidwiferyOrganization of Health ServicesQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID31193799
PMCPMC6543174
OpenAlexW2938471568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.