Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31193592›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2019

Computer-assisted image analysis of the tumor microenvironment on an oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma tissue microarray.

Sangjune Laurence Lee, Michael Cabanero, Martin Hyrcza, Marcus Butler, Fei-Fei Liu, Aaron Hansen, Shao Hui Huang, Ming-Sound Tsao, Yuyao Song, Lin Lu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Correlation of microscopic tumor extension with tumor microenvironment in esophageal cancer patients.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Identification of an Immune Score-Based Gene Panel with Prognostic Power for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. The Microenvironment of Tongue Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sangjune Laurence LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Michael CabaneroDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Martin HyrczaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Marcus ButlerPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada.
Fei-Fei LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Aaron HansenPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada.
Shao Hui HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Ming-Sound TsaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Yuyao SongPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada.
Lin LuPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada.
Wei XuPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada.
Douglas B ChepehaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada.
David P GoldsteinPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada.
Ilan WeinrebDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Scott V BratmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) displays variable levels of immune cells within the tumor microenvironment. The quantity and localization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), specific functional TIL subsets (e.g., CD8+), and biomarker-expressing cells (e.g., PD-L1+) may have prognostic and predictive value. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the robustness and utility of computer-assisted image analysis tools to quantify and localize immunohistochemistry-based biomarkers within the tumor microenvironment on a tissue microarray (TMA). We stained a 91-patient OTSCC TMA with antibodies targeting CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, IDO, and PD-L1. Cell populations were segmented into epithelial (tumor) or stromal compartments according to a mask derived from a pan-cytokeratin stain. Definiens Tissue Studio was used to enumerate marker-positive cells or to quantify the staining intensity. Automated methods were validated against manual tissue segmentation, cell count, and stain intensity quantification. Univariate associations of cell count and stain intensity with smoking status, stage, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were determined. Our results revealed that the accuracy of automated tissue segmentation was dependent on the distance of the tissue section from the cytokeratin mask and the proportion of the tissue containing tumor vs. stroma. Automated and manual cell counts and stain intensities were highly correlated (Pearson coefficient range: 0.46-0.90; p < 0.001). Within this OTSCC cohort, smokers had significantly stronger PD-L1 stain intensity and higher numbers of CD3+, CD4+ and FOXP3+ TILs. In the subset of patients who had received adjuvant radiotherapy, a higher number of CD8+ TILs was associated with inferior OS and DFS. Taken together, this proof-of-principle study demonstrates the robustness and utility of computer-assisted image analysis for high-throughput assessment of multiple IHC markers on TMAs, with potential implications for studies on prognostic and predictive biomarkers.

Identifiers

PMID31193592
PMCPMC6536490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.