ArticlePreventive medicine reports2019
Randomized controlled trial of centralized vaccine reminder/recall to improve adult vaccination rates in an accountable care organization setting.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02133391 (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality R18), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality R18: Accountable Care Organizations (ACO)/ Public Health Collaborative Preventive Care Delivery to Priority Populations
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies to promote vaccination uptake.Nature human behaviour · 2024Pooled it
- Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of communicating with people over 50 years of age about vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Factors associated with pneumococcal vaccine hesitancy and interventions to improve vaccine uptake in older adults: A narrative review using an established conceptual framework.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Interventions to improve pneumococcal vaccination coverage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Infectious medicine · 2026Review
- Implementation strategies to increase seasonal influenza vaccination among adults: A rapid scoping review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Factors impacting vaccine uptake among adult Medicaid beneficiaries: a systematic literature review.Health affairs scholar · 2024Review
- Mobile Phone Text Message Reminders to Improve Vaccination Uptake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vaccines · 2024Review
- Increasing pneumococcal vaccine uptake in older adults: a scoping review of interventions in high-income countries.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- State-Level Variations and Factors Associated with Adult Vaccination Coverage: A Multilevel Modeling Approach.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2021Article
- The potential for centralized reminder/recall to increase immunization rates: A national survey of immunization information systems (IIS) managers.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
- Cost-effectiveness of Interventions to Increase HPV Vaccine Uptake.Pediatrics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our objectives were to assess 1) effectiveness of using Colorado's Immunization Information System (CIIS) to send out vaccine reminder/recalls (R/Rs) centrally vs. usual care for adult vaccine delivery within an accountable care organization (ACO) and 2) practice staff's perception of centralized R/R. From 9/2016 to 4/2017, we conducted a randomized controlled trial among adults enrolled in a Medicaid ACO at six healthcare entities. Adults were divided into two strata: 15,153 age 19-64 and 616 age 65+. Adults age 19-64 who needed influenza and/or Tdap vaccine, and adults age 65+ who needed influenza, and/or Tdap, and/or a pneumococcal vaccine were randomized to receive up to 3 R/Rs by autodialed telephone and mail or usual care. Documentation of receipt of any needed vaccines in CIIS within six months was the primary outcome. We assessed intervention effectiveness using mixed effect logistic regression. Thirteen semi-structured exit interviews were conducted with staff from each healthcare entity. The intervention was not associated with the primary outcome for the age 19-64 population [OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.98-1.15)] or age 65+ population [(OR 0.96 (0.69-1.32)]. Practice staff perceived the intervention to be beneficial and not burdensome. Perceived barriers included lack of availability of appointments and adults receiving only influenza vaccine when other vaccines were needed. In conclusion, centralized R/R was not effective at improving adult vaccination rates in a Medicaid ACO. Future studies should consider better harmonizing vaccine centralized R/Rs with vaccine delivery efforts within the practice setting. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02133391.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.