Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31193580›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2019

Randomized controlled trial of centralized vaccine reminder/recall to improve adult vaccination rates in an accountable care organization setting.

Laura P Hurley, Brenda Beaty, Steven Lockhart, Dennis Gurfinkel, L Miriam Dickinson, Heather Roth, Allison Kempe

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02133391 (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality R18), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02133391 nacompletednot on this map

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality R18: Accountable Care Organizations (ACO)/ Public Health Collaborative Preventive Care Delivery to Priority Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2015 to 2017Enrolled78,354ConditionsImmunization Reminder SystemArmsCentralized Reminder/Recall (R/R), Practice-based Reminder/Recall
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura P HurleyAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Childrens Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Brenda BeatyAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Childrens Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Steven LockhartAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Childrens Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Dennis GurfinkelAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Childrens Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
L Miriam DickinsonAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Childrens Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Heather RothColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO, United States of America.
Allison KempeAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Childrens Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America.

Funding

ACO/Public Health Collaborative Preventive Care Delivery to Priority PopulationsR18HS022648 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KEMPE, ALLISON · 2013 to 2013
$2.4M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS022648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objectives were to assess 1) effectiveness of using Colorado's Immunization Information System (CIIS) to send out vaccine reminder/recalls (R/Rs) centrally vs. usual care for adult vaccine delivery within an accountable care organization (ACO) and 2) practice staff's perception of centralized R/R. From 9/2016 to 4/2017, we conducted a randomized controlled trial among adults enrolled in a Medicaid ACO at six healthcare entities. Adults were divided into two strata: 15,153 age 19-64 and 616 age 65+. Adults age 19-64 who needed influenza and/or Tdap vaccine, and adults age 65+ who needed influenza, and/or Tdap, and/or a pneumococcal vaccine were randomized to receive up to 3 R/Rs by autodialed telephone and mail or usual care. Documentation of receipt of any needed vaccines in CIIS within six months was the primary outcome. We assessed intervention effectiveness using mixed effect logistic regression. Thirteen semi-structured exit interviews were conducted with staff from each healthcare entity. The intervention was not associated with the primary outcome for the age 19-64 population [OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.98-1.15)] or age 65+ population [(OR 0.96 (0.69-1.32)]. Practice staff perceived the intervention to be beneficial and not burdensome. Perceived barriers included lack of availability of appointments and adults receiving only influenza vaccine when other vaccines were needed. In conclusion, centralized R/R was not effective at improving adult vaccination rates in a Medicaid ACO. Future studies should consider better harmonizing vaccine centralized R/Rs with vaccine delivery efforts within the practice setting. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02133391.

Indexed as

Accountable care organizationAdultClinical trialInfluenza vaccinesPertussis vaccinePneumococcal vaccinesVaccination

Identifiers

PMID31193580
PMCPMC6536777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.