ArticleHeliyon2019
Synthesis, crystal structures, Hirshfeld surface analysis and spectroscopic studies of two Schiff bases of anisaldehyde and their urease and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties.
Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Therapeutic potential of morpholine-based compounds in neurodegenerative diseases: SAR insights and analysis.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing demand of pharmaceutical industry for more effective drugs requires new molecules with promising medicinal activities. In the present work, a natural product anisaldehyde was treated with hydrazine and 3,5-dichloroaniline to synthesize their Schiff bases, ASB1 and ASB2, which were assessed for various bioactivities. ASB1 was synthesized by conventional reflux method while ASB2 was synthesized by reflux as well as by mechanochemical grinding method which gave higher yield. The bases were recrystalised, and their structures were elucidated based on XRD and spectroscopic studies. Hirshfeld surface analysis was also carried out. They showed considerable urease inhibitory activity, almost comparable with the standard thiourea. The activity of ASB1 was much higher than ASB2. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of ASB1 was also higher than that of ASB2. The antioxidant activities were determined using DPPH, ABTS radical scavenging and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) assays. The bases were very poor scavengers of DPPH radical. However, they showed considerable anti-radical activity against ABTS radical, ASB2 being more active than ASB1, while ASB1 showed higher TAC than ASB2. In conclusion, the bases appeared to have good drugability as inhibitors of urease and acetylcholinesterase enzymes. They can be easily synthesized for possible large-scale applications. The grinding method proved to be more efficient than the reflux method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.