Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31193452›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

Evaluation of mandibular calcification on 3D volume images.

Barbara Schreiner-Tiefenbacher, Vivian Forster, Klaudio Pauli, Walter Sutter, Marius Meier, Henning Roland, Patrick Bandura, Dritan Turhani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An updated review of idiopathic osteosclerosis of the jaws.Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara Schreiner-TiefenbacherCentre for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Danube Private University (DPU), Krems, Austria.
Vivian ForsterCentre for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Danube Private University (DPU), Krems, Austria.
Klaudio PauliCentre for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Danube Private University (DPU), Krems, Austria.
Walter SutterCentre for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Danube Private University (DPU), Krems, Austria.
Marius MeierCentre for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Danube Private University (DPU), Krems, Austria.
Henning RolandCentre for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Danube Private University (DPU), Krems, Austria.
Patrick BanduraCentre for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Danube Private University (DPU), Krems, Austria.
Dritan TurhaniCentre for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Danube Private University (DPU), Krems, Austria.
Danube Private University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBone and soft-tissue calcifications are often coincidentally diagnosed on digital panoramic radiographs (DPRs). As the use of three-dimensional (3D) images has increased in the past decade for diagnostics in the mandibular region, we evaluated 3D volume images derived from 2D panoramic images to determine if this method is suitable for early detection of calcifications in this region.

methodsIn this study, three investigators retrospectively and independently evaluated 822 DPRs. If one or more calcifications were present, the 3D volume image from that patient was retrospectively evaluated to confirm the incidental findings. A radiographic system with a low-dose mode and a high-resolution 3D-image function was used. The investigators focussed on the most common calcifications, including tonsilloliths (TL), idiopathic osteosclerosis (IO) of the mandible, carotid artery calcifications (CAC), calcified submandibular lymph nodes (hereafter, CSL), and sialoliths of the submandibular salivary gland (SSG).

resultsOne or more calcifications were identified in 415 (50.5%) DPRs. In total, 718 calcifications were detected, 30.2% of which were TL, 16.3% IO, 11.3% CAC, 8.8% CSL, and 1.7% SSG. Only 287 (39.97 %) of the calcifications were confirmed on 3D volume images; of these, 29.2% were TL, 58.5% IO, 0.2% CAC, and 1.4% SSG. No CSLs were detected.

conclusionsNot all areas shown on the DPRs were visible in the retrospectively obtained 3D volume images. Whereas DPRs are used to diagnose calcifications such as IO, TL, SSG, CAC, and CSL, the 3D volume images were only useful for confirming the existence of IO, TL, and SSG calcifications.

Indexed as

DentistryMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID31193452
PMCPMC6529742
OpenAlexW2944882006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.