Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31193389›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2019

Disentangling

Ingrid A Lotta, Gediminas Valkiūnas, M Andreína Pacheco, Ananías A Escalante, Sandra Rocío Hernández, Nubia E Matta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Survey of Haemosporidian Parasites in Wild Stone-Curlews (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Phylogenetic assessment ofParasitology · 2025
    Article
  6. Unraveling the host range ofParasitology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Parasitology · 2023
    Article
  10. Host Cells ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Insights into the Biology ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A new haemosporidian parasite from the Red-legged SeriemaInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ingrid A LottaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá- Facultad de Ciencias - Departamento de Biología - Grupo de Investigación Caracterización Genética e Inmunología, Carrera 30 No. 45-03, Bogotá, 111321, Colombia.
Gediminas ValkiūnasInstitute of Ecology, Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, Vilnius-21, LT, 08412, Lithuania.
M Andreína PachecoInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine (iGEM), Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ananías A EscalanteInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine (iGEM), Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sandra Rocío HernándezUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá- Facultad de Ciencias - Departamento de Biología - Grupo de Investigación Caracterización Genética e Inmunología, Carrera 30 No. 45-03, Bogotá, 111321, Colombia.
Nubia E MattaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá- Facultad de Ciencias - Departamento de Biología - Grupo de Investigación Caracterización Genética e Inmunología, Carrera 30 No. 45-03, Bogotá, 111321, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avian communities from South America harbor an extraordinary diversity of

Indexed as

Andean mountainsBirdsCo-infectionCotingidaeGrallaridaeNew speciesPasseriforms

Identifiers

PMID31193389
PMCPMC6526250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.