Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31193374›Full record

ArticleIBRO reports2019

An

Muhammed Khairujjaman Mazumder, Shuvasish Choudhury, Anupom Borah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IBRO reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pomegranate (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Ellagic Acid-Derived Urolithins as Modulators of Oxidative Stress.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammed Khairujjaman MazumderCentral Instrumentation Laboratory, Assam University, Silchar, 788011, Assam, India.
Shuvasish ChoudhuryCentral Instrumentation Laboratory, Assam University, Silchar, 788011, Assam, India.
Anupom BorahCellular and Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, Department of Life Science and Bioinformatics, Assam University, Silchar, 788011, Assam, India.
Assam University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevation in the levels of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), and downregulation of cellular antixoidants, have ubiquitously been reported from studies in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Thus, plant-derived compounds are widely being investigated for their beneficial effects in these models. However, while studies have reported antioxidant potentials of several phytochemicals, a large number of studies have demonstrated different phytochemicals to be rather pro-oxidant and exaggerate oxidative stress (OS). One such study aimed to investigate possible ameliorative effect of Pomegranate juice (PJ) in rat model of toxin-induced parkinsonism revealed that PJ exacerbates OS, inflammation and promotes neurodegeneration. Thus, it remains to be investigated whether different constituents and metabolites of PJ are pro-oxidant or anti-oxidant. Using computational modeling, we investigated possible inhibitory potential of different constituents of PJ and their metabolites viz. delphinidin-3-glucoside, dimethylellagic acid-glucuronide, ellagic acid, ellagitannin, gallic acid, gallotannin 23, pelargonidin, punicalagin, urolithin A, urolithin A-glucuronide and urolithin B, on anti-oxidant defense system of the brain. The results indicate that the constituents of PJ have the potential to inhibit five key enzymes of the neuronal antioxidant defense system, viz. catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase 4, glutathione reductase and glutathione-S-transferase. Thus, it is surmised that the constituents of PJ may contribute to OS and neurodegeneration by way of affecting antioxidant defense mechanism. This may particularly be more pronounced in neurodegenerative diseases, since neurons are known to be more vulnerable to OS. Thus, the present findings caution the use of PJ in patients prone to OS, especially those suffering from neurodegenerative diseases, and warrant further experimental studies to unveil the effects of individual components and metabolites of PJ on antioxidant defense system of brain.

Indexed as

AntioxidantMolecular dockingNeurodegenerationOxidative stressPhytochemicalPro-oxidant

Identifiers

PMID31193374
PMCPMC6527820
OpenAlexW2943834574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.