Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31193262›Full record

ArticleRadiology case reports2019

Appearance of cerebral infarct fogging on CT perfusion.

Maria Braileanu, Brent D Weinberg, Ranliang Hu, Michael J Hoch

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria BraileanuDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Brent D WeinbergDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Ranliang HuDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Michael J HochDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fogging is a deceptive phenomenon that can partially or completely obscure a subacute infarct on noncontrast head CT. We present the appearance of infarct fogging on CT perfusion through 3 cases. At time of fogging, the subacute infarctions demonstrated variable mean transit time with increased cerebral blood volume and cerebral blood flow on CT perfusion. Fogging occurred within 6-10 days, sooner than the previously described 2-3 weeks in classic fogging. At time of fogging, CT perfusion demonstrated a "luxury-like" perfusion pattern and augmented the identification of the true extent of the infarction at time of fogging.

Indexed as

Cerebral infarct/strokeCT perfusionFogging effectNoncontrast head CTVasospasm

Identifiers

PMID31193262
PMCPMC6522841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.