ReviewJournal of advanced research2019
Bio-barcode detection technology and its research applications: A review.
Review in Journal of advanced research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- LeGenD: High-throughput N-glycan profiling using explainable AI and lectin profiling.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Design Principles of Nanosensors for Multiplex Detection of Contaminants in Food.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- Liquid-Solid Triboelectric Nanogenerator-Based DNA Barcode Detection Biosensor for Species Identification.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Bimetallic Coordination Polymers: Synthesis and Applications in Biosensing and Biomedicine.Biosensors · 2024Review
- New insights from nanotechnology in SARS-CoV-2 detection, treatment strategy, and prevention.Materials today. Chemistry · 2023Review
- A highly sensitive bio-barcode immunoassay for multi-residue detection of organophosphate pesticides based on fluorescence anti-quenching.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2022Article
- Multifunctional Gold Nanoparticles for Improved Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications: A Review.Nanoscale research letters · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid development of nanotechnology, the bio-barcode assay (BCA), as a new diagnostic tool, has been gradually applied to the detection of protein and nucleic acid targets and small-molecule compounds. BCA has the advantages of high sensitivity, short detection time, simple operation, low cost, good repeatability and good linear relationship between detection results. However, bio-barcode technology is not yet fully formed as a complete detection system, and the detection process in all aspects and stages is unstable. Therefore, studying the optimal reaction conditions, optimizing the experimental steps, exploring the multi-residue detection of small-molecule substances, and preparing immuno-bio-barcode kits are important research directions for the standardization and commercialization of BCA. The main theme of this review was to describe the principle of BCA, provide a comparison of its application, and introduce the single-residue and multi-residue detection of macromolecules and single-residue detection of small molecules. We also compared it with other detection methods, summarized its feasibility and limitations, expecting that with further improvement and development, the technique can be more widely used in the field of stable small-molecule and multi-residue detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.