Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31193209›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

How to quantify social media influencers: An empirical application at the Teatro alla Scala.

Agostino Deborah, Arnaboldi Michela, Calissano Anna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Agostino DeborahDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano Italy.
Arnaboldi MichelaDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano Italy.
Calissano AnnaMOX - Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A topic of primary importance for organizations is the ability to identify and appraise Social Media Influencers (SMIs), given their key role in affecting conversations and interactions on social media. According to the current research in this area, influencers make up a single category of social media users, but only limited attention has been paid concerning the extent to which they can exert their influence. In this study, the quantification and classification of SMIs is addressed by proposing an advanced methodology based on social network analysis - K-shell decomposition - together with a discussion on the relationship between the different SMI categories and the effect of each type of influencer on the public relation activity of an organization. The developed methodology was tested through an action research project conducted at the Teatro alla Scala of Milan, and the results were then discussed with the management of the opera house. The main finding of this work is that SMIs can be split into writers, authorities or spreaders on the basis of the kind of influence they exert, thereby delivering a precisely focused typology of SMIs. These findings enhance our academic knowledge on analytics applied to social science, while also providing a real case situation where managers make practical use of analytics.

Indexed as

BusinessComputer scienceInformation scienceTourism

Identifiers

PMID31193209
PMCPMC6522665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.