Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31193037›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

Preoperative systemic inflammatory markers in low- and high-grade gliomas: A retrospective analysis of 171 patients.

Rahsan Kemerdere, Mehmet Yigit Akgun, Sureyya Toklu, Orkhan Alizada, Taner Tanriverdi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rahsan KemerdereDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Yigit AkgunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sureyya TokluDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Orkhan AlizadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Taner TanriverdiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePreoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) are recognized as prognostic markers of grade of gliomas. The aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative levels of NLR, PLR, and LMR differ between low- and high-grade gliomas.

methodsRetrospective analysis of preoperative neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, and platelet counts and NLR, PLR, and LMR were performed in 171 patients who underwent glioma surgery. The results were compared between low- and high-grade gliomas.

resultsNeutrophil count was significantly increased while lymphocyte count significantly decreased in high-grade gliomas (HGGs). NLR and PLR were significantly higher in HGGs but LMR was significantly reduced in HGGs. NLR and PLR correlated with glioma grade and only NLR showed highest accuracy predicting higher grade.

conclusionsLevels of preoperative NLR value can help to evaluate disease progression and predict higher grade of glioma.

Indexed as

Oncology

Identifiers

PMID31193037
PMCPMC6513782
OpenAlexW2944682606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.