Trial reportMedicine2019
Evaluation of blood flow on optic nerve head after pattern scan and conventional laser panretinal photocoagulation.
Trial report in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laser Speckle Flowgraphy (LSFG) in Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review of Recent Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Retinal Microvascular Resistance Estimated From Waveform Analysis Is Significantly Higher in Diabetic Retinopathy.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Effect of panretinal photocoagulation versus intravitreal bevacizumab injection on optic disc microcirculation in patients with diabetic retinopathy.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of Fundus Autofluorescence in Laser Photocoagulation Scars for Diabetic Retinopathy: Conventional vs. Short-Pulse Laser.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the changes in the blood flow on retina and the optic nerve head (ONH) after conventional laser treatment and to compare it to that after patterned scanning laser (PASCAL) treatment in patients with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (S-NPDR).In this prospective, cross-sectional study, the blood flow on retina and the ONH was assessed by laser speckle flowgraphy using the mean blur rate (MBR) in 39 eyes with S-NPDR before, 1, 4, 8, 12 weeks after panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). Of 39 eyes, 17eyes with 17 patients treated by conventional laser and 22 eyes with 22 patients treated by PASCAL.The mean age was 55.5 ± 11.5 years in the conventional laser group, 55.6 ± 11.8 years in the PASCAL group. The MBR-vessel, which can be dominantly expressed as retinal blood flow, was significantly reduced after PRP treated by conventional laser (P < .001), but did not change after PRP treated by PASCAL. The ratio of MBR-vessel to the baseline was significantly lower in the conventional laser group only at Week 1 (P = .045). The MBR-tissue, which can be dominantly expressed as the ONH blood flow, did not significantly change after PRP in the both group. The multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that the laser burns was an independent factor significantly correlated with the ratio of MBR-vessel at Week 1 to the baseline (β = -0.550, P = .012).The retinal blood flow was significantly reduced during the 12 weeks only after completion of PRP by conventional laser treatment. Our results indicate that short pulse on PRP treatment performed by the PASCAL would not significantly reduce the retinal blood flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.