ArticleMedicine2019
Clinical efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated with chronic renal insufficiency: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research and application of KABP nursing model in cardiac rehabilitation of patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this research is to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) by meta-analysis, to provide scientific and effective medical evidence for PCI in patients with AMI complicated with CRI, and to support the clinical application of PCI.
methodsElectronic databases will be searched, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, CBM, VIP, and Wanfang Data. Patients with AMI complicated by renal insufficiency treated with PCI will be included. The retrieval time is from inception to January 2019. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are formulated to search only the relevant literature. Endnote software management for literature will be adopted. The literature will be independently screened by 2 researchers. Excel 2016 will be applied to extract literature data with the "Research Information Registration Form." The final selected literature will be assessed for bias risk. Stata 12.0 software will be used for the meta-analysis.
resultsThe systematic evaluation and meta-analysis will be carried out strictly in accordance with the requirements of the Cochrane System Evaluator Manual 5.3 on meta-analyses, which will provide a high-quality evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of PCI in patients with AMI and CRI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study belongs to the category of systematic reviews, not clinical trials. Therefore, it does not require ethical approval. The results of this study will be published in influential international academic journals related to this topic.
conclusionPCI is an effective and safe treatment for patients with AMI and CRI. This study will provide a definite evidence-based medical conclusion and provide a scientific basis for the clinical treatment of patients with AMI and CRI. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019131367.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.