Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31192254›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2019

Noninvasive Indirect Markers of Liver Fibrosis in Alcoholics.

Lech Chrostek, Dagmara Przekop, Ewa Gruszewska, Monika Gudowska-Sawczuk, Bogdan Cylwik

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Serum biomarkers for liver fibrosis assessment.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chemokines in Primary Liver Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Non-invasive precise staging of liver fibrosis using deep residual network model based on plain CT images.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lech ChrostekDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 15A, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6701-1861
Dagmara PrzekopDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 15A, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.
Ewa GruszewskaDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 15A, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.
Monika Gudowska-SawczukDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 15A, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.
Bogdan CylwikDepartment of Pediatric Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 17, 15-274 Bialystok, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic values of noninvasive indirect markers of liver fibrosis: APRI, GAPRI, Forns, FIB-4, Age-Platelet, and Hepascore in alcoholics. Blood samples were collected from a randomized group of 142 alcohol-dependent patients. The diagnosis of dependency was made according to the ICD-10 WHO criteria. The values of noninvasive markers were calculated with specific algorithms. The fibrosis stage was evaluated on the basis of FibroTest. The values of APRI, Forns, FIB-4, GAPRI, AP, and Hepascore differ between various stages of liver fibrosis. Patients with fibrosis stage F0 present lower values of APRI, Forns, FIB-4, GAPRI, and Hepascore in comparison to the patients with stages F1 and F0-F1. Patients with fibrosis stages < F2 have lower values of all noninvasive markers than patients with stages ≥F2. Patients with fibrosis stages ≥F2 but <F4 have lower values of APRI, Forns, FIB-4, GAPRI, and Hepascore than patients with stage F4. The values of noninvasive markers tested here differ in various stages of liver fibrosis. To our surprise, the patented marker, Hepascore, achieves a lower diagnostic value in alcoholics than simple markers involving only liver enzymes, platelet count, and cholesterol. The best marker of liver fibrosis in alcoholic patients seems to be the Forns index.

Indexed as

AdultAlcoholismBiomarkersFemaleHumansLiver Cirrhosis, AlcoholicMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31192254
PMCPMC6525841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.