Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31192078›Full record

Article3 Biotech2019

Bioaugmentation of soil with

Poulomi Chakraborty, Ranojit Kumar Sarker, Rupsa Roy, Abhrajyoti Ghosh, Debasish Maiti, Prosun Tribedi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Influence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Poulomi ChakrabortyDepartment of Biotechnology, The Neotia University, Sarisha, Kolkata, West Bengal 743368 India.
Ranojit Kumar SarkerDepartment of Biotechnology, The Neotia University, Sarisha, Kolkata, West Bengal 743368 India.
Rupsa Roy2Department of Biochemistry, Bose Institute Centenary Campus, Kolkata, 700054 India.
Abhrajyoti Ghosh2Department of Biochemistry, Bose Institute Centenary Campus, Kolkata, 700054 India.
Debasish Maiti3Department of Human Physiology, Tripura University (A Central University), Agartala, Tripura 799022 India.
Prosun TribediDepartment of Biotechnology, The Neotia University, Sarisha, Kolkata, West Bengal 743368 India.
Bose Institute · INTripura University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofertilizer happens to be a promising alternative of chemical fertilizer in the establishment of sustainable agricultural practices. Following this observation, several nitrogen-fixing bacteria were isolated from the soil in which an isolate (AKS7) was selected for further studies as AKS7 showed considerable competence in growth on nitrogen-free growth medium. Acetylene reduction assay confirmed that AKS7 can fix atmospheric nitrogen efficiently. The result of Kjeldahl assay revealed that the organism (AKS7) could fix nitrogen up to 12 mg in 8 days. A strong positive correlation (

Indexed as

Microbial functional-diversityMicrobial nitrogen fixationSoil fertilitySoil microbial activity

Identifiers

PMID31192078
PMCPMC6555835
OpenAlexW2955267125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.