Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31191985›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2019

Current review of surgical management options for extremity bone sarcomas.

Catalin Cirstoiu, Bogdan Cretu, Bogdan Serban, Zsombor Panti, Mihai Nica

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Oncological and endoprosthetic outcomes of bone sarcoma patients: a nationwide cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catalin CirstoiuCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan CretuCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan SerbanCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Bucharest, Romania.
Zsombor PantiCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Bucharest, Romania.
Mihai NicaCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Bucharest, Romania.
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern surgical management of extremity bone sarcomas is governed by limb-sparing surgery combined with adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.All the resection and reconstruction techniques have to achieve oncologic excision margins, with survival rates and functional results superior to amputation.The main reconstruction techniques of bone defects resulted after resection are: modular endoprosthetic reconstruction; bone graft reconstruction; bone transport; resection arthrodesis; and rotationplasty.Oncologic resection and modular endoprosthetic reconstruction are the generally approved surgical options adopted for the majority of cases in major specialized bone sarcoma centres.Good basic principles, efficient multidisciplinary approach and sustained research in the field can provide a better future for the challenge posed by extremity bone sarcoma treatment. Cite this article:

Indexed as

Bone sarcomamodular endoprosthesesreconstruction

Identifiers

PMID31191985
PMCPMC6540945
OpenAlexW2944041548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.