ArticleJournal of virus eradication2019
A study using knowledge, attitude and practices on the prevention of HIV-1 vertical transmission with outcomes in early infant HIV-1 diagnosis in Eastern Uganda.
Article in Journal of virus eradication, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess trends over time using knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) among mothers living with HIV and rates of early infant diagnosis (EID) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in a hospital in Eastern Uganda, which is included in the National HIV Prevention Strategy (NHPS) in Uganda.
methodsA thematic qualitative assessment was conducted using focus group discussions (FGDs) with pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers and women attending the antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinic, all living with HIV. In addition, we have performed key informant interviews (KIIs) in October 2011 (baseline) and November 2016 (follow-up) at Mbale Regional Referral Hospital. Data were captured through customised source documents, written narratives and voice recordings. Social scientists decoded, analysed and interpreted the qualitative data with quality control. Retrospective data were obtained from EID registers for 2010 before and 2015 at the end of the NHPS, respectively. Supplementary quantitative data from the same hospital regarding trends of HIV-1 vertical transmission rates were collected from EID registers at baseline and at follow-up. Comparisons were made between HIV-1 transmission rates and KAP levels at baseline and at follow-up.
resultsThree paired sets of FGD sessions, consisting of 8-10 participants for each of the groups of pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers and women attending ART clinic, all living with HIV, were conducted at baseline and at follow-up. Age ranged from 17 to 40 years. Two sets of paired KII interviews corresponding to the periods before and after the NHPS were also held. All study FGDs and KIIs showed improvement in KAP on HIV-1 vertical transmission and lower EID rates when comparing baseline to the follow-up period [9/69 (13.0%) and 14/336 (4.2%)], respectively (
conclusionImprovement was noted in KAP on HIV-1 vertical transmission in pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers and women attending ART clinic, all HIV positive, in a regional referral hospital in Eastern Uganda over a 5-year period and was associated with a reduction in vertical transmission rates. Our data suggest that KAP is an effective type of intervention with regard to the prevention of HIV-1 vertical transmission in this population in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31191913PMC6543483W2985338539What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.