Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31191599›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

Leveraging Fecal Bacterial Survey Data to Predict Colorectal Tumors.

Bangzhou Zhang, Shuangbin Xu, Wei Xu, Qiongyun Chen, Zhangran Chen, Changsheng Yan, Yanyun Fan, Huangkai Zhang, Qi Liu, Jie Yang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Faecal microbial biomarkers in early diagnosis of colorectal cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021
    Review
  7. Microbiome Analysis of More Than 2,000 NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Samples Shows the Potential to Improve Screening Accuracy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Alteration of the abundance ofOncology letters · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bangzhou ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Shuangbin XuXiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China.
Wei XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Qiongyun ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Zhangran ChenInstitute for Microbial Ecology, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Changsheng YanInstitute for Microbial Ecology, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yanyun FanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Huangkai ZhangXiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China.
Qi LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Jie YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Jinfeng YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Chuanxing XiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Hongzhi XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jianlin RenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks second in cancer-associated mortality and third in the incidence worldwide. Most of CRC follow adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and have more than 90% chance of survival if diagnosed at early stage. But the recommended screening by colonoscopy is invasive, expensive, and poorly adhered to. Recently, several studies reported that the fecal bacteria might provide non-invasive biomarkers for CRC and precancerous tumors. Therefore, we collected and uniformly re-analyzed these published fecal 16S rDNA sequencing datasets to verify the association and identify biomarkers to classify and predict colorectal tumors by random forest method. A total of 1674 samples (330 CRC, 357 advanced adenoma, 141 adenoma, and 846 control) from 7 studies were analyzed in this study. By random effects model and fixed effects model, we observed significant differences in alpha-diversity and beta-diversity between individuals with CRC and the normal colon, but not between adenoma and the normal. We identified various bacterial genera with significant odds ratios for colorectal tumors at different stages. Through building random forest model with 10-fold cross-validation as well as new test datasets, we classified individuals with CRC, advanced adenoma, adenoma and normal colon. All approaches obtained comparable performance at entire OTU level, entire genus level, and the common genus level as measured using AUC. When combined all samples, the AUC of random forest model based on 12 common genera reached 0.846 for CRC, although the predication performed poorly for advance adenoma and adenoma.

Indexed as

colorectal adenomacolorectal cancerfecal bacteriarandom effects modelrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID31191599
PMCPMC6547015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.