Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31191461›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2019

Nucleoside Analogues as Antibacterial Agents.

Jessica M Thomson, Iain L Lamont

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. TargetingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. DPAGT1-Perspective as an Anticancer Drug Target.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Antifungal Activity of 5-Fluorouridine AgainstMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica M ThomsonDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Iain L LamontDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid increase in antibiotic-resistant bacteria has emphasized the urgent need to identify new treatments for bacterial infections. One attractive approach, reducing the need for expensive and time-consuming clinical trials, is to repurpose existing clinically approved compounds for use as antibacterial agents. Nucleoside analogues are commonly used for treating viral and fungal infections, as well as for treating cancers, but have received relatively little attention as treatments for bacterial infections. However, a significant number of clinically approved derivatives of both pyrimidines and purines including halogenated, thiolated, and azolated compounds have been shown to have antibacterial activity. In the small number of studies carried out to date, such compounds have shown promise in treating bacterial infections. Here, we review the mechanisms of action and antibacterial activities of nucleoside analogues that can potentially be repurposed for treating infections as well as considering possible limitations in their usage.

Indexed as

antibacterial agentsantibiotic resistanceantimicrobialmultidrug-resistant bacteriapurine analoguespyrimidine analoguesrepurposed antibiotics

Identifiers

PMID31191461
PMCPMC6540614
OpenAlexW2945343235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.