Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31191389›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Acoustic Correlates and Adult Perceptions of Distress in Infant Speech-Like Vocalizations and Cries.

Hyunjoo Yoo, Eugene H Buder, Dale D Bowman, Gavin M Bidelman, D Kimbrough Oller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protophones, the precursors to speech, dominate the human infant vocal landscape.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyunjoo YooDepartment of Communicative Disorders, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States.
Eugene H BuderSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Dale D BowmanInstitute for Intelligent Systems, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Gavin M BidelmanSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
D Kimbrough OllerSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
University of Memphis · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Infant Vocal Communication: Typical Development and Autism RiskR01DC015108 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI GIPSON, TANJALA TRINETTE, OLLER, D. KIMBROUGH · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Vocal exploration and interaction in the emergence of speechR01DC011027 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI OLLER, D. KIMBROUGH · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
Neuroimaging biomarkers of speech processing deficits in MCIR01DC016267 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI BIDELMAN, GAVIN M. · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011027NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015108NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior research has not evaluated acoustic features contributing to perception of human infant vocal distress or lack thereof on a continuum. The present research evaluates perception of infant vocalizations along a continuum ranging from the most prototypical intensely distressful cry sounds ("wails") to the most prototypical of infant sounds that typically express no distress (non-distress "vocants"). Wails are deemed little if at all related to speech while vocants are taken to be clear precursors to speech. We selected prototypical exemplars of utterances representing the whole continuum from 0 and 1 month-olds. In this initial study of the continuum, our goals are to determine (1) listener agreement on level of vocal distress across the continuum, (2) acoustic parameters predicting ratings of distress, (3) the extent to which individual listeners maintain or change their acoustic criteria for distress judgments across the study, (4) the extent to which different listeners use similar or different acoustic criteria to make judgments, and (5) the role of short-term experience among the listeners in judgments of infant vocalization distress. Results indicated that (1) both inter-rater and intra-rater listener agreement on degree of vocal distress was high, (2) the best predictors of vocal distress were number of vibratory regimes within utterances, utterance duration, spectral ratio (spectral concentration) in vibratory regimes within utterances, and mean pitch, (3) individual listeners significantly modified their acoustic criteria for distress judgments across the 10 trial blocks, (4) different listeners, while showing overall similarities in ratings of the 42 stimuli, also showed significant differences in acoustic criteria used in assigning the ratings of vocal distress, and (5) listeners who were both experienced and inexperienced in infant vocalizations coding showed high agreement in rating level of distress, but differed in the extent to which they relied on the different acoustic cues in making the ratings. The study provides clearer characterization of vocal distress expression in infants based on acoustic parameters and a new perspective on active adult perception of infant vocalizations. The results also highlight the importance of vibratory regime segmentation and analysis in acoustically based research on infant vocalizations and their perception.

Indexed as

acoustic analysisactive perceptionadult perceptionbabblingcrydistress soundsfussinfant vocalizations

Identifiers

PMID31191389
PMCPMC6548812
OpenAlexW2947543723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.