Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31191264›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2019

Evaluating Complexity of Fetal MEG Signals: A Comparison of Different Metrics and Their Applicability.

Julia Moser, Siouar Bensaid, Eleni Kroupi, Franziska Schleger, Fabrice Wendling, Giulio Ruffini, Hubert Preißl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia MoserfMEG Center/Internal Medicine IV/Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Hemholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Siouar BensaidINSERM, U1099, Rennes 1 University, Rennes, France.
Eleni KroupiStarlab SLU, Barcelona, Spain.
Franziska SchlegerfMEG Center/Internal Medicine IV/Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Hemholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Fabrice WendlingINSERM, U1099, Rennes 1 University, Rennes, France.
Giulio RuffiniStarlab SLU, Barcelona, Spain.
Hubert PreißlfMEG Center/Internal Medicine IV/Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Hemholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
German Center for Diabetes Research · DEInserm · FRStarlab Barcelona SLU (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we aim to investigate whether information based metrics of neural activity are a useful tool for the quantification of consciousness before and shortly after birth. Neural activity is measured using fetal magnetoencephalography (fMEG) in human fetuses and neonates. Based on recent theories on consciousness, information-based metrics are established to measure brain complexity and to assess different levels of consciousness. Different metrics (measures of entropy, compressibility and fractality) are, thus, explored in a reference population and their usability is evaluated. For comparative analysis, two fMEG channels were selected: one where brain activity was previously detected and one at least 15 cm away, that represented a control channel. The usability of each metric was evaluated and results from the brain and control channel were compared. Concerning the ease of use with fMEG data, Lempel-Ziv-Complexity (LZC) was evaluated as best, as it is unequivocal and needs low computational effort. The fractality measures have a high number of parameters that need to be adjusted prior to analysis and therefore forfeit comparability, while entropy measures require a higher computational effort and more parameters to adjust compared to LZC. Comparison of a channel with brain activity and a control channel in neonatal recordings showed significant differences in most complexity metrics. This clear difference can be seen as proof of concept for the usability of complexity metrics in fMEG. For fetal data, this comparison produced less clear results which can be related to leftover maternal signals included in the control channel. Further work is necessary to conclusively interpret results from the analysis of fetal recordings. Yet this study shows that complexity metrics can be used for fMEG data on early consciousness and the evaluation gives a guidance for future work. The inconsistency of results from different metrics highlights the challenges of working with complexity metrics as neural correlates of consciousness, as well as the caution one should apply to interpret them.

Indexed as

complexityentropyfMEGfractalityLZCneurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID31191264
PMCPMC6546028
OpenAlexW2949291469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.