Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31191241›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2019

Editing the Central Nervous System Through CRISPR/Cas9 Systems.

Agustin Cota-Coronado, Néstor Fabián Díaz-Martínez, Eduardo Padilla-Camberos, N Emmanuel Díaz-Martínez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Construction of Fzd6Molecular biology reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Nanoparticle delivery systems for substance use disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  13. CRISPR-Cas knockout of miR21 reduces glioma growth.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Basic and Preclinical Research for Personalized Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agustin Cota-CoronadoBiotecnología Médica y Farmacéutica CONACYT, Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco (CIATEJ), Guadalajara, Mexico.
Néstor Fabián Díaz-MartínezDepartamento de Fisiología y Desarrollo Celular, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Eduardo Padilla-CamberosBiotecnología Médica y Farmacéutica CONACYT, Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco (CIATEJ), Guadalajara, Mexico.
N Emmanuel Díaz-MartínezBiotecnología Médica y Farmacéutica CONACYT, Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco (CIATEJ), Guadalajara, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The translational gap to treatments based on gene therapy has been reduced in recent years because of improvements in gene editing tools, such as the CRISPR/Cas9 system and its variations. This has allowed the development of more precise therapies for neurodegenerative diseases, where access is privileged. As a result, engineering of complexes that can access the central nervous system (CNS) with the least potential inconvenience is fundamental. In this review article, we describe current alternatives to generate systems based on CRISPR/Cas9 that can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and may be used further clinically to improve treatment for neurodegeneration in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Indexed as

adenovirus-associated virusblood–brain barriercentral nervous systemCRISPR/Cas9d-Cas9“Trojan horse” peptides

Identifiers

PMID31191241
PMCPMC6546027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.