Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31191212›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Neural Dynamics of Olfactory Perception: Low- and High-Frequency Modulations of Local Field Potential Spectra in Mice Revealed by an Oddball Stimulus.

Jeungeun Kum, Jin Won Kim, Oliver Braubach, Jong-Gyun Ha, Hyung-Ju Cho, Chang-Hoon Kim, Hio-Been Han, Jee Hyun Choi, Joo-Heon Yoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dynamic switching of neural oscillations in the prefrontal-amygdala circuit for naturalistic freeze-or-flight.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jeungeun KumBrain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, South Korea.
Jin Won KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Oliver BraubachBrain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, South Korea.
Jong-Gyun HaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyung-Ju ChoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Chang-Hoon KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hio-Been HanBrain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, South Korea.
Jee Hyun ChoiBrain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, South Korea.
Joo-Heon YoonDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent brain connectome studies have evidenced distinct and overlapping brain regions involved in processing olfactory perception. However, neural correlates of hypo- or anosmia in olfactory disorder patients are poorly known. Furthermore, the bottom-up and top-down processing of olfactory perception have not been well-documented, resulting in difficulty in locating the disease foci of olfactory disorder patients. The primary aim of this study is to characterize the bottom-up process of the neural dynamics across peripheral and central brain regions in anesthetized mice. We particularly focused on the neural oscillations of local field potential (LFP) in olfactory epithelium (OE), olfactory blub (OB), prefrontal cortex (PFC), and hippocampus (HC) during an olfactory oddball paradigm in urethane anesthetized mice. Odorant presentations evoked neural oscillations across slow and fast frequency bands including delta (1-4 Hz), theta (6-10 Hz), beta (15-30 Hz), low gamma (30-50 Hz), and high gamma (70-100 Hz) in both peripheral and central nervous systems, and the increases were more prominent in the infrequently presented odorant. During 5 s odorant exposures, the oscillatory responses in power were persistent in OE, OB, and PFC, whereas neural oscillations of HC increased only for short time at stimulus onset. These oscillatory responses in power were insignificant in both peripheral and central regions of the ZnSO

Indexed as

anterior cingulate cortexanterior olfactoryattentionlocal field potentialneural oscillationsoddball paradigmolfactionprimary olfactory cortex

Identifiers

PMID31191212
PMCPMC6546879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.