Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31191181›Full record

ArticleFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2018

Use of Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention in Treatment With Adults.

Meghan E McDevitt-Murphy, Matthew T Luciano, Rebecca J Zakarian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meghan E McDevitt-MurphyDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
Matthew T LucianoDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
Rebecca J ZakarianDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.

Funding

Reducing hazardous drinking and PTSD-related avoidance through a brief alcohol intervention with an avoidance-focused feedback supplementF31AA026174 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI LUCIANO, MATTHEW THOMAS · 2018 to 2018
$34k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA026174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the use of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and ecological momentary intervention (EMI) in clinical research applications. EMA refers to a method of data collection that attempts to capture respondents' activities, emotions, and thoughts in the moment, in their natural environment. It typically uses prompts administered through a personal electronic device, such as a smartphone or tablet. EMI extends this technique and includes the use of microlevel interventions administered through personal electronic devices. These technological developments hold promise for enhancing psychological treatments by prompting the patient outside of therapy sessions in his or her day-to-day environment. Research suggests that EMI may be beneficial to participants and that this effect is amplified when EMI is delivered in the context of ongoing psychotherapy. EMI may reflect a cost-effective mechanism to enhance therapeutic outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID31191181
PMCPMC6493252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.