ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2019
Prediction of difficult airway management in traumatic cervical spine injury: influence of retropharyngeal space extension.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Radiological indicators and a novel combined predictive model for anticipating difficult laryngoscopy in cervical spondylosis patients: a prospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Identification of difficult laryngoscopy using an optimized hybrid architecture.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Expert consensus on difficult airway assessment.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2023Review
- Radiological indicators to predict the application of assistant intubation techniques for patients undergoing cervical surgery.BMC anesthesiology · 2020Article
- A new simple score for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: the EL.GA+ score.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2020Observational
- Case Report of the Unusual Presentation of Stridor in an Elderly Patient Following a Cervical Fracture.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetropharyngeal hematoma following cervical spine trauma may lead to life-threatening upper airway obstruction and difficult airway management. This retrospective study was performed to investigate whether the extension of retropharyngeal space (RPS) was associated with difficult intubation by direct laryngoscopy in traumatic cervical spine injury. PATIENTS AND
methodsSixty-two patients who had undergone direct endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia for cervical spine surgery were retrospectively identified. Laryngoscopic grade by Cormack-Lehane (C-L) classification was collected; grade 1 or 2 was categorized as easy laryngoscopy, whereas grade 3 or 4 was categorized as difficult laryngoscopy. In these patients, RPS thickness and the proportions of RPS to the vertebral bodies were measured at the 2nd, 5th and 7th cervical spine levels using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine. Measures of RPS were compared between easy and difficult laryngoscopy. Relationships between measures of RPS and difficult laryngoscopy were analyzed with logistic regression analysis.
resultsRPS thickness at C2 was significantly greater in difficult laryngoscopy (median 14.29 mm, IQR: 9.75-18.04) than easy laryngoscopy (median 5.10, IQR: 4.33-5.94,
conclusionRPS extension at the upper cervical spine level is associated with difficult direct laryngoscopy in traumatic cervical spine injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.