Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31190482›Full record

ReviewThe world journal of men's health2020

Vitamin D and Male Fertility: An Updated Review.

Gianmartin Cito, Andrea Cocci, Elisabetta Micelli, Alejandro Gabutti, Giorgio Ivan Russo, Maria Elisabetta Coccia, Giorgio Franco, Sergio Serni, Marco Carini, Alessandro Natali

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The world journal of men's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vitamin D Deficiency in Testicular Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Gianmartin CitoDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. gianmartin.cito@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7526-4025
Andrea CocciDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-6294
Elisabetta MicelliDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Claire Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1450-0810
Alejandro GabuttiDepartment of Radiology, Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Health Sciences and Nutrition, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1860-1408
Giorgio Ivan RussoDepartment of Urology, Vittorio Emanuele II, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-7353
Maria Elisabetta CocciaAssisted Reproductive Technology Centre, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5294-129X
Giorgio FrancoDepartment of Urology, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3653-3389
Sergio SerniDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8699-985X
Marco CariniDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2288-3647
Alessandro NataliDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4456-7626
University of Florence · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, the key role of vitamin D in male reproductive system has been suggested, since the expression of vitamin D receptors and metabolizing enzymes was demonstrated in the testis and spermatozoa. Nevertheless, a general consensus about the role of vitamin D in male fertility is still debated. The aim of this review is to provide an updated systematic revision of the current available literature, discussing the experimental and clinical evidence on the role of vitamin D in the regulation of testis hormone production, seminal parameters and male fertility. The consequences of vitamin D deficiency on serum levels of testicular hormones have been analysed by several observational and interventional studies, with controversial results. Equally, the experimental researches not were able to state a certain relationship between vitamin D status and testis hormone production. Possible bias, including age, body mass index, and baseline vitamin D status justified the differences among studies. As well as concerning the effect of vitamin D on semen parameters, most of the studies agreed in the possibility that vitamin D might have a positive effect on human male fertility potential, particularly through better sperm motility. Regarding pregnancy outcomes, normal level of vitamin D seems to be related to better pregnancies. However, all the previous studies displayed a wide heterogeneity in study design, population, methodology, and cut off values used for the evaluation of vitamin D status. Future studies are needed to better clarify the exact role of vitamin D on hormonal and seminal panel in both fertile and infertile men.

Indexed as

Male infertilityReproductionSemen qualityVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID31190482
PMCPMC7076312
OpenAlexW2946201656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.