Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31190297›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2019

Predicting side-specific prostate cancer extracapsular extension: a simple decision rule of PSA, biopsy, and MRI parameters.

Piotr Zapała, Bartosz Dybowski, Ewa Bres-Niewada, Tomasz Lorenc, Agnieszka Powała, Zbigniew Lewandowski, Marek Gołębiowski, Piotr Radziszewski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Piotr ZapałaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4, 02-005, Warsaw, Poland.
Bartosz DybowskiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4, 02-005, Warsaw, Poland. bartosz.dybowski@wum.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-6920
Ewa Bres-NiewadaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4, 02-005, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz Lorenc1st Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka PowałaDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Zbigniew LewandowskiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marek Gołębiowski1st Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr RadziszewskiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4, 02-005, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop an easy-to-use side-specific tool for the prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension (ECE) using clinical, biopsy, and MRI parameters. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective analysis of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy preceded by staging multiparametric MRI of the prostate was performed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to choose independent predictors of ECE. Continuous variables were transformed to categorical ones by choosing threshold values using spline knots or testing thresholds used in previously described models. Internal validation of the rule was carried out as well as validation of other algorithms on our group was performed.

resultsIn the analyzed period of time, 88 out of 164 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy met inclusion criteria. ECE was evidenced at radical prostatectomy in 41 patients (46.6%) and in 53 lobes (30.1%). In the multivariate analysis PSA, total percentage of cancerous tissue in cores (%PCa) and maximum tumour diameter (MTD) of Likert 3-5 lesions on MRI were independent predictors of ECE. The following rule for predicting side-specific ECE was proposed: %PCa ≥ 15% OR MTD ≥ 15 mm OR PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL. Internal validation of the algorithm revealed safe lower confidence limits for sensitivity and NPV, proving that model offers accurate risk grouping that can be safely used in decision-making.

conclusionThe rule developed in this study makes ECE prediction fast, intuitive, and side-specific. However, until validated externally it should be used with caution.

Indexed as

Extranodal ExtensionAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyClinical Decision-MakingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingPredictive Value of TestsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenExtracapsular extensionLocally advanced prostate cancerMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingNomogramPredictive modelPrognostic tool

Identifiers

PMID31190297
PMCPMC6713688
OpenAlexW2951436954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.