Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31190227›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

The hidden cost of an extensive preoperative work-up: predictors of attrition after referral for bariatric surgery in a universal healthcare system.

Aristithes G Doumouras, Yung Lee, Glenda Babe, Scott Gmora, Jean-Eric Tarride, Dennis Hong, Mehran Anvari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aristithes G DoumourasDivision of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Yung LeeDivision of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Glenda BabeInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Scott GmoraDivision of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jean-Eric TarridePrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health Research Institute, St Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Dennis HongDivision of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. dennishong70@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1792-1255
Mehran AnvariDivision of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAPrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health Research Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery is in high demand and patients generally undergo an extensive work-up process to maximize the success of surgery, especially in universal healthcare systems. Although valuable, this work-up process can lead to attrition before surgery. Therefore, we aim to assess patient and health system factors associated with attrition after bariatric surgery referral in a universal healthcare system.

methodsThis was a population-based study of all patients aged ≥ 18 referred for bariatric surgery in Ontario, Canada from 2009 to 2015. Primary outcome was patients who dropped out of bariatric surgery after referral. Predictors of attrition after referral included patient demographics, clinical, institutional, and socioeconomic variables. Odds ratios and 95% CIs were estimated by multilevel logistic regression models.

resultsFrom 17,703 patients that were referred for bariatric surgery, 4122 patients dropped after the initial referral. Male patients, increasing age, and longer wait times for surgery were significantly (P < 0.0001) associated with higher odds of attrition. Additionally, smoker status, immigration status, unemployment, and disability were significant factors (P < 0.0001) predicting attrition. Patients who lived in lowest income quintile neighborhoods, when compared to those from the richest neighborhoods, had significantly higher odds of attrition (P = 0.02). Sleep apnea was associated with lower odds of attrition while diabetes and heart failure both with higher odds of attrition.

conclusionEven in a universal healthcare system, there are various factors that could lead to increased odds of attrition before bariatric surgery. Clear disparities exist for certain marginalized populations. Further studies are warranted to ensure equitable utilization of bariatric surgery for all patients.

Indexed as

Universal Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBariatric SurgeryFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidOntarioPatient DropoutsPreoperative CareReferral and ConsultationAttritionBariatric surgeryDrop outUniversal Healthcare

Identifiers

PMID31190227
OpenAlexW2951848987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.