Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31190223›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Multivariate analysis of the factors affecting the prognosis of walled-off pancreatic necrosis after endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage.

Jintao Guo, Bowen Duan, Siyu Sun, Sheng Wang, Xiang Liu, Nan Ge, Wen Liu, Shupeng Wang, Jinlong Hu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Infected pancreatic necrosis-Current trends in management.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Endoscopic step up: When and how.Surgery open science · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jintao GuoEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China.
Bowen DuanEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China.
Siyu SunEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China. sun-siyu@163.com.
Sheng WangEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China.
Xiang LiuEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China.
Nan GeEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China.
Wen LiuEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China.
Shupeng WangEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China.
Jinlong HuEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China.
China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage has become the treatment of choice for walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). However, no consensus exists on the most significant patient- and procedure-related factors that affect prognosis. The aim of the study is to investigate the correlation between patient- and procedure-related factors and post-procedure complications after EUS-guided drainage.

methodsA retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics of patients with WOPN who underwent EUS-guided drainage at our endoscopy center between November 2011 and August 2017 was performed. Chi-square analysis and binary logistic regression statistical methods were used to analyze the correlation between influencing factors and prognosis.

resultsA total of 85 patients (male/female, 50/35) with WOPN were included in the study. The average age was 44.95 years. The cyst diameter was 10.58 ± 4.78 cm. Multivariate analysis showed that WOPN with higher solid content (> 30%) increased the probability of endoscopic necrosectomy (OR 6.798; 95% CI 1.423, 32.470; p = 0.016). The use of a metal stent increased the probability of endoscopic necrosectomy (OR 3.503; 95% CI 1.251, 9.810; p = 0.017) and the length of hospitalization (OR 3.315; 95% CI 1.192, 9.215; p = 0.022). Female patients had a higher probability of requiring endoscopic necrosectomy (OR 2.683; 95% CI 1.027, 7.007; p = 0.044) and prolonged hospitalization (OR 2.675; 95% CI 1.065, 6.721; p = 0.036).

conclusionThe solid content of WOPN, type of stent, and sex of patients were associated with increased probability of endoscopic necrosectomy.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsAnalysis of VarianceDrainageEndoscopyEndosonographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPancreasPancreatic CystPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisEndoscopic necrosectomyMultifactor analysisPrognosisWalled-off pancreatic necrosis

Identifiers

PMID31190223
OpenAlexW2950943244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.