Trial reportHNO2019
[Sleep position trainers for treatment of supine obstructive sleep apnea : A comparison of two different training modalities].
Trial report in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany patients suffer from positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA; 56%). In these cases, positional therapy may be an option. A sleep position trainer (SPT) is a small vibrating device that trains the patient to avoid sleeping in the supine position. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of gradual and intensive training onset in POSA patients MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with mild to moderate POSA and incompliance with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy were included in this prospective double-blind trail. Patients were randomized according to how training was initiated and the SPT was set to either a gradual or an intensive training program. Polygraphy was used to check respiratory parameters after 1 month, and subjective parameters and compliance were assessed prior to and after this time period using a questionnaire.
resultsA total of 38 patients were included (20 intensive; 18 gradual; 49 ± 13 years) of whom 31 completed the study protocol. After 1 month the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in both groups was significantly reduced, but there was no difference in AHI between the two training modalities (AHI intensive: 16.7 ± 6.3/h to 4.2 ± 3.2/h; AHI gradual: 18.9 ± 11.2/h to 8.4 ± 7.9/h). The same effect was observed for subjective sleepiness.
conclusionThe objective severity of OSA and the associated subjective daytime sleepiness was reduced in both groups. There was no difference in terms of clinical outcome or compliance between the gradual or intensive SPT therapy in POSA patients during the observation period. Both training modalities are highly successful and well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31190192What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.