Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31190176›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

What can artificial intelligence teach us about the molecular mechanisms underlying disease?

Gary J R Cook, Vicky Goh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Introduction to Radiomics.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. A bird's-eye view of deep learning in bioimage analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  13. EJNMMI supplement: bringing AI and radiomics to nuclear medicine.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gary J R CookCancer Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK. gary.cook@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8732-8134
Vicky GohCancer Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16463Cancer Research UK 20000Cancer Research UK A16463Department of Health 09/22/49Wellcome Trust 203148Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While molecular imaging with positron emission tomography or single-photon emission computed tomography already reports on tumour molecular mechanisms on a macroscopic scale, there is increasing evidence that there are multiple additional features within medical images that can further improve tumour characterization, treatment prediction and prognostication. Early reports have already revealed the power of radiomics to personalize and improve patient management and outcomes. What remains unclear is how these additional metrics relate to underlying molecular mechanisms of disease. Furthermore, the ability to deal with increasingly large amounts of data from medical images and beyond in a rapid, reproducible and transparent manner is essential for future clinical practice. Here, artificial intelligence (AI) may have an impact. AI encompasses a broad range of 'intelligent' functions performed by computers, including language processing, knowledge representation, problem solving and planning. While rule-based algorithms, e.g. computer-aided diagnosis, have been in use for medical imaging since the 1990s, the resurgent interest in AI is related to improvements in computing power and advances in machine learning (ML). In this review we consider why molecular and cellular processes are of interest and which processes have already been exposed to AI and ML methods as reported in the literature. Non-small-cell lung cancer is used as an exemplar and the focus of this review as the most common tumour type in which AI and ML approaches have been tested and to illustrate some of the concepts.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiseaseMolecular ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedArtificial intelligenceMachine learning, deep learningMolecular imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID31190176
PMCPMC6879441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.