ReviewWorld journal of urology2020
Tissue engineering of the urethra: where are we in 2019?
Review in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- A prospective, multi-center, open-label, single-arm phase 2b study of autologous adult live cultured buccal epithelial cells (AALBEC) in the treatment of bulbar urethral stricture.World journal of urology · 2021Trial
- When will bioprinting become a therapy? Translational and regulatory challenges in urogenital tissue engineering and surgery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- 3D-Printed Sodium Alginate/Gelatin/Black Phosphorus Nanosheet Hydrogel Patches for Urethral Stricture Repair.International journal of biomaterials · 2026Article
- Application of decellularized tilapia skin in rabbit urethral reconstruction: an experimental study.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- 3D-bioprinted urethral grafts: Revolutionizing urethral stricture treatment.Arab journal of urology · 2025Review
- The Regenerative Microenvironment of the Tissue Engineering for Urethral Strictures.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- Follow-up and histocompatibility observation of urethral reconstruction with different materials.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2024Article
- Biological Macromolecule-Based Scaffolds for Urethra Reconstruction.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Buccal mucosa for use in urethral reconstruction: evolution of use over the last 30 years.Frontiers in urology · 2023Review
- Prospects and Challenges of Electrospun Cell and Drug Delivery Vehicles to Correct Urethral Stricture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Successful engraftment of epithelial cells derived from autologous rabbit buccal mucosal tissue, encapsulated in a polymer scaffold in a rabbit model of a urethral stricture, transplanted using the transurethral approach.Regenerative therapy · 2021Article
- Comparison of two different methods of establishment of canine urethroplasty model: an experimental trial.BMC urology · 2021Article
- Genitourinary Tissue Engineering: Reconstruction and Research Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Patient-reported outcomes for typical single cheek harvesting vs atypical lingual, labial or bilateral cheeks harvesting: a single-center analysis of more than 800 patients.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- A Scarless Healing Tale: Comparing Homeostasis and Wound Healing of Oral Mucosa With Skin and Oesophagus.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Is regenerative medicine the future of urology?World journal of urology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this review is to assess the potential role of tissue engineering for urethral reconstruction. It is well- recognised that urethrotomy remains the first-line therapy in the treatment of urethral stricture. Following on from the randomised study which recommended no difference between urethrotomy and urethral dilation, Steenkamp et al. reported long-term success rates of only 20%. Patients with longer strictures, penile or distal urethral strictures, and extensive periurethral spongiofibrosis typically do not respond well to repeated incisions. This report reviews the potential role of tissue engineering as applied to augmentation urethroplasty, which is the treatment of choice following failed urethrotomy.
methodsA review of the literature was carried out. The principal emphasis was on tissue engineering as applied to augmentation urethroplasty, but an introductory section reviews the use of urethrotomy and the background to contemporary practise with augmentation urethroplasty using oral mucosa.
resultsIt is evident that a cellular matrix which requires the ingrowth of cells is unlikely to be successful except for very short strictures. Other approaches such as injection of stem cells have not been adequately trialled in humans to date. Tissue-engineered substitute for autologous oral mucosa has been used and the results relating to this are reviewed.
conclusionsTissue engineering of autologous tissue for urethroplasty is expensive. It is unnecessary for the majority of cases, but could be potentially useful for very lengthy strictures, for instance, relating to lichen sclerosis. Whilst tissue-engineered oral mucosa has been successfully used, a great deal more work would be necessary to develop an appropriate matrix. Another study has looked at a larger series using an alternative tissue-engineered substitute, but the results have been very disappointing. At present, it has to be concluded that there is no effective and validated tissue engineering solution for the management of urethral stricture disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.