ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2019
How the depth of processing modulates emotional interference - evidence from EEG and pupil diameter data.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolating perceptual conflict: a theoretical and methodological analysis of the Task-Irrelevant Paradigm.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Semantic inhibition impairment in college students with depressive states as evidenced by EEG and pupillometry during the hayling task.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- To see or not to see: the parallel processing of self-relevance and facial expressions.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to process emotionally conflicting information is an important requirement for emotional self-control. While it seems obvious that the impact of interfering emotional information critically depends on how deeply this interfering information is processed, it is still unknown what cognitive subprocesses are most affected by manipulating the depth of processing of emotionally interfering information. We examine these aspects integrating neurophysiological (EEG) and source localization data with pupil diameter data as an indirect index of the norepinephrine (NE) system activity. We show that when processing depth of interfering emotional stimulus dimensions is increased, emotional Stroop effects become stronger. The EEG data show that this was associated with modulations of decision-making processes, as reflected by the P3 event-related potential. Notably, the integration with pupil diameter data suggests that these decision processes were modulated by the NE system, especially when the depth of processing of interfering emotional stimulus dimensions was increased. This likely reflects gain modulation processes to facilitate processing of complex interfering, emotional information. The source localization results suggest that regions in the parietal (BA7) and insular cortex (BA13) are associated with these modulatory effects. The results suggest that overcoming more complex emotional interference triggers engagement of the norepinephrine system (indexed by pupil diameter) to facilitate action control mechanisms in a time-specific manner when deeper processing of emotional stimulus dimensions is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31190135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.