Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31190092›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2020

Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

Brian A Anderson, Haena Kim, Mark K Britton, Andy Jeesu Kim

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05560425 (Pilot Study on Mindfulness Meditation and Behavioral Flexibility Among Emerging Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05560425 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study on Mindfulness Meditation and Behavioral Flexibility Among Emerging Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2023 to 2023Enrolled16ConditionsAlcohol Abuse, Cognitive Deficit in AttentionArmsKoru Mindfulness (KM) Training, Navigating College (NC) Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The past, present, and future of selection history.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Relating value-driven attention to psychopathology.Current opinion in psychology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian A AndersonDepartment of Psychology, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-4235, USA. brian.anderson@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6620-3703
Haena KimDepartment of Psychology, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-4235, USA.
Mark K BrittonDepartment of Psychology, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-4235, USA.
Andy Jeesu KimDepartment of Psychology, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-4235, USA.

Funding

The Control of Attention and Learning from Physical EffortR01DA046410 · NIDA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, BRIAN AUGUST · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation NARSAD Young Investigator Grant 26008NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046410NIH HHS R01-DA046410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward history is a powerful determinant of what we pay attention to. This influence of reward on attention varies substantially across individuals, being related to a variety of personality variables and clinical conditions. Currently, the ability to measure and quantify attention-to-reward is restricted to the use of psychophysical laboratory tasks, which limits research into the construct in a variety of ways. In the present study, we introduce a questionnaire designed to provide a brief and accessible means of assessing attention-to-reward. Scores on the questionnaire correlate with other measures known to be related to attention-to-reward and predict performance on multiple laboratory tasks measuring the construct. In demonstrating this relationship, we also provide evidence that attention-to-reward as measured in the lab, an automatic and implicit bias in information processing, is related to overt behaviors and motivations in everyday life as assessed via the questionnaire. Variation in scores on the questionnaire is additionally associated with a distinct biomarker in brain connectivity, and the questionnaire exhibits acceptable test-retest reliability. Overall, the Value-Driven Attention Questionnaire (VDAQ) provides a useful proxy-measure of attention-to-reward that is much more accessible than typical laboratory assessments.

Indexed as

RewardSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAttentionBrainCaudate NucleusCognitionElectric StimulationEye MovementsFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansIndividualityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Identifiers

PMID31190092
PMCPMC6906260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.