Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31190078›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2019

Cell wall hydrolases act in concert during aerenchyma development in sugarcane roots.

Adriana Grandis, Débora C C Leite, Eveline Q P Tavares, Bruna C Arenque-Musa, Jonas W Gaiarsa, Marina C M Martins, Amanda P De Souza, Leonardo D Gomez, Claudia Fabbri, Benedetta Mattei and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Effects of NAA on the Tuberous Root Yield and Quality ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Plant Proteomics and Systems Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Adriana GrandisLaboratory of Plant Physiological Ecology (LAFIECO), Department of Botany, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Débora C C LeiteLaboratory of Plant Physiological Ecology (LAFIECO), Department of Botany, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Eveline Q P TavaresLaboratory of Plant Physiological Ecology (LAFIECO), Department of Botany, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Bruna C Arenque-MusaLaboratory of Plant Physiological Ecology (LAFIECO), Department of Botany, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Jonas W GaiarsaGaTE Lab, Department of Botany, Institute of Bioscience, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marina C M MartinsLaboratory of Plant Physiological Ecology (LAFIECO), Department of Botany, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Amanda P De SouzaLaboratory of Plant Physiological Ecology (LAFIECO), Department of Botany, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Leonardo D GomezCentre for Novel Agricultural Products, Department of Biology, University of York, UK.
Claudia FabbriDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology 'C. Darwin', University of Rome - Sapienza, Italy.
Benedetta MatteiDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology 'C. Darwin', University of Rome - Sapienza, Italy.
Marcos S BuckeridgeLaboratory of Plant Physiological Ecology (LAFIECO), Department of Botany, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsCell wall disassembly occurs naturally in plants by the action of several glycosyl-hydrolases during different developmental processes such as lysigenous and constitutive aerenchyma formation in sugarcane roots. Wall degradation has been reported in aerenchyma development in different species, but little is known about the action of glycosyl-hydrolases in this process.

methodsIn this work, gene expression, protein levels and enzymatic activity of cell wall hydrolases were assessed. Since aerenchyma formation is constitutive in sugarcane roots, they were assessed in segments corresponding to the first 5 cm from the root tip where aerenchyma develops. KEY

resultsOur results indicate that the wall degradation starts with a partial attack on pectins (by acetyl esterases, endopolygalacturonases, β-galactosidases and α-arabinofuranosidases) followed by the action of β-glucan-/callose-hydrolysing enzymes. At the same time, there are modifications in arabinoxylan (by α-arabinofuranosidases), xyloglucan (by XTH), xyloglucan-cellulose interactions (by expansins) and partial hydrolysis of cellulose. Saccharification revealed that access to the cell wall varies among segments, consistent with an increase in recalcitrance and composite formation during aerenchyma development.

conclusionOur findings corroborate the hypothesis that hydrolases are synchronically synthesized, leading to cell wall modifications that are modulated by the fine structure of cell wall polymers during aerenchyma formation in the cortex of sugarcane roots.

Indexed as

SaccharumCell WallHydrolasesMeristemPlant RootsHydrolasesAerenchymacell wall compositeglycosyl-hydrolasesproteomicssaccharificationSaccharum

Identifiers

PMID31190078
PMCPMC6881219
OpenAlexW2953374847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.