Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31190075›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2020

Sepsis in the era of data-driven medicine: personalizing risks, diagnoses, treatments and prognoses.

Andrew C Liu, Krishna Patel, Ramya Dhatri Vunikili, Kipp W Johnson, Fahad Abdu, Shivani Kamath Belman, Benjamin S Glicksberg, Pratyush Tandale, Roberto Fontanez, Oommen K Mathew and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effect of Anticoagulant Versus Non-Anticoagulant Therapy on Mortality of Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew C LiuDepartment of Information Services, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Krishna PatelDepartment of Information Services, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Ramya Dhatri VunikiliCenter for Research Informatics and Innovation, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Kipp W JohnsonDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.
Fahad AbduCenter for Research Informatics and Innovation, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Shivani Kamath BelmanCenter for Research Informatics and Innovation, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Benjamin S GlicksbergDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.
Pratyush TandaleCenter for Research Informatics and Innovation, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Roberto FontanezDepartment of Information Services, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Oommen K MathewTBC, B3, JKR, Aluva, Kerala, India.
Andrew KasarskisDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.
Priyabrata MukherjeeUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Lakshminarayanan SubramanianCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Joel T DudleyDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.
Khader ShameerDepartment of Information Services, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Northwell Health · USMount Sinai Health System · USCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

MSHS Translational Science HubUL1TR001433 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI WRIGHT, ROSALIND J · 2015 to 2019
$26.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a series of clinical syndromes caused by the immunological response to infection. The clinical evidence for sepsis could typically attribute to bacterial infection or bacterial endotoxins, but infections due to viruses, fungi or parasites could also lead to sepsis. Regardless of the etiology, rapid clinical deterioration, prolonged stay in intensive care units and high risk for mortality correlate with the incidence of sepsis. Despite its prevalence and morbidity, improvement in sepsis outcomes has remained limited. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the current landscape of risk estimation, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis strategies in the setting of sepsis and discuss future challenges. We argue that the advent of modern technologies such as in-depth molecular profiling, biomedical big data and machine intelligence methods will augment the treatment and prevention of sepsis. The volume, variety, veracity and velocity of heterogeneous data generated as part of healthcare delivery and recent advances in biotechnology-driven therapeutics and companion diagnostics may provide a new wave of approaches to identify the most at-risk sepsis patients and reduce the symptom burden in patients within shorter turnaround times. Developing novel therapies by leveraging modern drug discovery strategies including computational drug repositioning, cell and gene-therapy, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats -based genetic editing systems, immunotherapy, microbiome restoration, nanomaterial-based therapy and phage therapy may help to develop treatments to target sepsis. We also provide empirical evidence for potential new sepsis targets including FER and STARD3NL. Implementing data-driven methods that use real-time collection and analysis of clinical variables to trace, track and treat sepsis-related adverse outcomes will be key. Understanding the root and route of sepsis and its comorbid conditions that complicate treatment outcomes and lead to organ dysfunction may help to facilitate identification of most at-risk patients and prevent further deterioration. To conclude, leveraging the advances in precision medicine, biomedical data science and translational bioinformatics approaches may help to develop better strategies to diagnose and treat sepsis in the next decade.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineHumansPrognosisRisk FactorsSepsiscomputational medicinegenome informaticsprecision medicinesepsistranslational bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID31190075
PMCPMC8179509
OpenAlexW2985149427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.