Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31190000›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2019

Implementation of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guidelines on HER2/neu Assessment by FISH in breast cancers: predicted impact in a single institutional cohort.

Somaye Zare, Juan Rong, Svenja Daehne, Andres Roma, Farnaz Hasteh, Marie Dell'Aquila, Oluwole Fadare

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Somaye ZareDepartment of Pathology, Anatomic Pathology Division, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Juan RongDepartment of Pathology, Anatomic Pathology Division, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Svenja DaehneDepartment of Pathology, Anatomic Pathology Division, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Andres RomaDepartment of Pathology, Anatomic Pathology Division, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Farnaz HastehDepartment of Pathology, Anatomic Pathology Division, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Marie Dell'AquilaDepartment of Pathology, Anatomic Pathology Division, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Oluwole FadareDepartment of Pathology, Anatomic Pathology Division, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. ofadare@ucsd.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP) update modified the interpretation guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing by incorporating immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results in a subset of cases. Importantly, the new guidelines eliminate "equivocal" results, as well as the use of alternative chromosome 17 probes as the primary strategy for resolving the indeterminate FISH results. Herein, we investigate the predicted impact of implementing the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 assessment by FISH in breast cancers, using data from a single institution. We compared the HER2 status of 1542 consecutive cases of breast carcinoma, interpreted by 2013 and 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines. In total, 10.7% (165/1542) of the cases had a different final interpretation by 2018 guidelines compared with 2013 guidelines, including 70 previously HER2-positive cases reclassified as negative, four previously negative cases reclassified as positive, and 91 previously equivocal cases reclassified as negative. Overall, the number of HER2-positive cancers was reduced by 66 cases (4.3% reduction in the HER2 positivity rate). The newly HER2-negative cases were mostly estrogen receptor positive (90%), progesterone receptor positive (80%), stage 1 (60.9%), and grade 1-2 (59.4%) cancers; 70% of them had been designated as HER2 positive only after the use of an alternative chromosome 17 FISH probe after an intially equivocal result from the standard CEP17 probe. Overall, implementing the revised 2018 HER2 guidelines is predicted to change the HER2 results of 10.7% of breast cancers, mainly by reclassifying previously equivocal to negative results.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMedical OncologyMiddle AgedYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.