Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31189944›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Quantitative Imaging features Improve Discrimination of Malignancy in Pulmonary nodules.

Yoganand Balagurunathan, Matthew B Schabath, Hua Wang, Ying Liu, Robert J Gillies

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A review on advances inInsights into imaging · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yoganand BalagurunathanQuantitative Sciences- Department of Bioinformatics & Biostatistics, H. Lee. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. yogab@moffitt.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5598-4727
Matthew B SchabathCancer Epidemiology, H. Lee. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3241-3216
Hua WangCancer Physiology, H. Lee. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Ying LiuCancer Physiology, H. Lee. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Robert J GilliesDepartment of Radiology, H. Lee. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8888-7747

Funding

Quantitative Imaging Clinical Validation Center at Moffitt Cancer CenterU01CA200464 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI JOHN J HEINE, Matthew B. Schabath · 2016 to 2026
$9.2M
Radiomics of NSCLCU01CA143062 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GILLIES, ROBERT J., SCHABATH, MATTHEW B. · 2010 to 2020
$5.7M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA143062NCI NIH HHS U01 CA200464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary nodules are frequently detected radiological abnormalities in lung cancer screening. Nodules of the highest- and lowest-risk for cancer are often easily diagnosed by a trained radiologist there is still a high rate of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN) of unknown risk. Here, we test the hypothesis that computer extracted quantitative features ("radiomics") can provide improved risk-assessment in the diagnostic setting. Nodules were segmented in 3D and 219 quantitative features are extracted from these volumes. Using these features novel malignancy risk predictors are formed with various stratifications based on size, shape and texture feature categories. We used images and data from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), curated a subset of 479 participants (244 for training and 235 for testing) that included incident lung cancers and nodule-positive controls. After removing redundant and non-reproducible features, optimal linear classifiers with area under the receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) curves were used with an exhaustive search approach to find a discriminant set of image features, which were validated in an independent test dataset. We identified several strong predictive models, using size and shape features the highest AUROC was 0.80. Using non-size based features the highest AUROC was 0.85. Combining features from all the categories, the highest AUROC were 0.83.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesRetrospective StudiesSolitary Pulmonary Nodule

Identifiers

PMID31189944
PMCPMC6561979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.