Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31189916›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Evolution of the avian digital pattern.

Kenta Kawahata, Ingrid Rosenburg Cordeiro, Shogo Ueda, Guojun Sheng, Yuuta Moriyama, Chika Nishimori, Reiko Yu, Makoto Koizumi, Masataka Okabe, Mikiko Tanaka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Atavisms in the avian hindlimb and early developmental polarity of the limb.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kenta KawahataSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Ingrid Rosenburg CordeiroSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Shogo UedaSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Guojun ShengInternational Research Center for Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yuuta MoriyamaSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2853-8051
Chika NishimoriSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Reiko YuSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Makoto KoizumiLaboratory Animal Facilities, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masataka OkabeDepartment of Anatomy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mikiko TanakaSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan. mitanaka@bio.titech.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8092-8594
Tokyo Institute of Technology · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKumamoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in digit number has occurred multiple times in the history of archosaur evolution. The five digits of dinosaur limbs were reduced to three in bird forelimbs, and were further reduced in the vestigial forelimbs of the emu. Regulation of digit number has been investigated previously by examining genes involved in anterior-posterior patterning in forelimb buds among emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae), chicken (Gallus gallus) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). It was described that the expression of posterior genes are conserved among these three birds, whereas expression of anterior genes Gli3 and Alx4 varied significantly. Here we re-examined the expression pattern of Gli3 and Alx4 in the forelimb of emu, chicken and zebra finch. We found that Gli3 is expressed in the anterior region, although its range varied among species, and that the expression pattern of Alx4 in forelimb buds is broadly conserved in a stage-specific manner. We also found that the dynamic expression pattern of the BMP antagonist Gremlin1 (Grem1) in limb buds, which is critical for autopodial expansion, was consistent with the digital pattern of emu, chicken and zebra finch. Furthermore, in emu, variation among individuals was observed in the width of Grem1 expression in forelimb buds, as well as in the adult skeletal pattern. Our results support the view that the signalling system that regulates the dynamic expression of Grem1 in the limb bud contributes substantially to variations in avian digital patterns.

Indexed as

Avian ProteinsBirdsEvolution, MolecularLimb BudsAnimalsForelimbIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsSpecies SpecificityZinc Finger Protein Gli3Avian ProteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsZinc Finger Protein Gli3

Identifiers

PMID31189916
PMCPMC6561939
OpenAlexW2952254235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.