Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31189905›Full record

ReviewHeredity2019

Highlights of Streptomyces genetics.

David A Hopwood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heredity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular and Biochemical Characterization of Xylanase Produced byJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Introduction to Nutrition and Cancer.Cancer treatment and research · 2024
    Review
  10. Genomes and secondary metabolomes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David A HopwoodDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, John Innes Centre, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR5 7UH, UK. david.hopwood@jic.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sixty years ago, the actinomycetes, which include members of the genus Streptomyces, with their bacterial cellular dimensions but a mycelial growth habit like fungi, were generally regarded as a possible intermediate group, and virtually nothing was known about their genetics. We now know that they are bacteria, but with many original features. Their genome is linear with a unique mode of replication, not circular like those of nearly all other bacteria. They transfer their chromosome from donor to recipient by a conjugation mechanism, but this is radically different from the E. coli paradigm. They have twice as many genes as a typical rod-shaped bacterium like Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis, and the genome typically carries 20 or more gene clusters encoding the biosynthesis of antibiotics and other specialised metabolites, only a small proportion of which are expressed under typical laboratory screening conditions. This means that there is a vast number of potentially valuable compounds to be discovered when these 'sleeping' genes are activated. Streptomyces genetics has revolutionised natural product chemistry by facilitating the analysis of novel biosynthetic steps and has led to the ability to engineer novel biosynthetic pathways and hence 'unnatural natural products', with potential to generate lead compounds for use in the struggle to combat the rise of antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, BacterialGenes, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological ProductsDNA ReplicationGenome, BacterialPolyketidesRecombination, GeneticStreptomycesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological ProductsPolyketides

Identifiers

PMID31189905
PMCPMC6781119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.