Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31189745›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2019

Genome survey and SSR analysis of

Guo-Qi Li, Li-Xiao Song, Chang-Qing Jin, Miao Li, Shi-Pei Gong, Ya-Fang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Conservation Genomics ofEvolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome Survey and SSR Analysis ofGenetics research · 2022
    Article
  11. A chromosome-scale genome assembly ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A First Genome Survey and Genomic SSR Marker Analysis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guo-Qi LiBreeding Base for State Key Laboratory of Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration in Northwest China, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, P.R. China guoqilee@163.com 1186720040@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6176-3621
Li-Xiao SongBreeding Base for State Key Laboratory of Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration in Northwest China, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, P.R. China guoqilee@163.com 1186720040@qq.com.
Chang-Qing JinBreeding Base for State Key Laboratory of Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration in Northwest China, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, P.R. China.
Miao LiBreeding Base for State Key Laboratory of Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration in Northwest China, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, P.R. China.
Shi-Pei GongBreeding Base for State Key Laboratory of Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration in Northwest China, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, P.R. China.
Ya-Fang WangBreeding Base for State Key Laboratory of Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration in Northwest China, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ApocynumBase CompositionGenome, PlantGenome SizeHeterozygoteMicrosatellite RepeatsApocynum venetumGC contentgenome sequencingheterozygosity ratioK-mer analysisSSR molecular marker

Identifiers

PMID31189745
PMCPMC6591564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.