Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31189672›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Spatial patterns and determinants of postnatal care use in Ethiopia: findings from the 2016 demographic and health survey.

Malede Mequanent Sisay, Tesfahun Taddege Geremew, Yeshambel Worku Demlie, Asaye Tariku Alem, Desalew Kassahun Beyene, Melkitu Fentie Melak, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye, Tadesse Awoke Ayele, Asrat Atsedeweyn Andargie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Malede Mequanent SisayEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tesfahun Taddege GeremewWest Gojjam Zone Health, Amhara National Regional Health Bureau, Bahir Dar, Amhara, Ethiopia.
Yeshambel Worku DemlieWest Gojjam Zone Health, Amhara National Regional Health Bureau, Bahir Dar, Amhara, Ethiopia.
Asaye Tariku AlemNorth Gondar Health, Amhara National Regional Health Bureau, Bahir Dar, Amhara, Ethiopia.
Desalew Kassahun BeyeneAwi Zone Health, Amhara National Regional Health Bureau, Bahir Dar, Amhara, Ethiopia.
Melkitu Fentie MelakHuman Nutrition, University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Kassahun Alemu GelayeEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tadesse Awoke AyeleEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Asrat Atsedeweyn AndargieEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Gondar, Ethiopia.
University of Gondar · ETAmhara Regional Health Bureau · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePostnatal care (PNC) is essential for preventing maternal and newborn deaths; however, it still remains less well recognised in low-income and middle-income countries. This study was aimed to explore geographical patterns and identify the determinants of PNC usage among women aged 15-49 years in Ethiopia.

methodsA secondary data analysis was conducted using the 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey data. A total of 7193 women were included in this analysis. We employed spatial scan statistics to detect spatial inequalities of PNC usage among women. A multilevel binary logistic regression model was fitted to identify factors associated with women's PNC.

resultsThe prevalence of PNC usage among women was 6.9% (95% CI 6.3% to 7.5%). The SaTScan spatial analysis identified three most likely clusters with low rates of PNC use namely southwestern Ethiopia (log likelihood ratio (LLR)=18.07, p<0.0001), southeast Ethiopia (LLR=14.29, p<0.001) and eastern Ethiopia (LLR=10.18, p=0.024). Women with no education (Adjusted Odd Ratio (AOR)=0.55, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.84) and in the poorest wealth quantile (AOR=0.55, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.78) were less likely to use PNC, while women aged 35-49 years (AOR: 1.75, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.04) and with at least four antenatal care (ANC) visits (AOR=2.37, 95% CI 1.71 to 3.29) were more likely to use PNC.

conclusionPNC usage remains a public health problem and has spatial variations at regional levels in the country. Low prevalence of PNC was detected in the Somali, Oromia, Gambella and Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People's Region (SNNPR) regions. Women with low educational status, old age, being in poorest wealth quantile and history of ANC visits were significantly associated with PNC usage. Hence, it is better to strengthen maternal health programmes that give special emphasis on health promotion with a continuum of care during pregnancy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDemographyEthiopiaFemaleHealth SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPostnatal CarePregnancyPrevalenceSpatial Analysisdemography and health surveymaternal medicinepostnatal careprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID31189672
PMCPMC6577400
OpenAlexW2952747597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.