Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31189127›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2019

Molecular prognostic factors in small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumours.

K G Samsom, L M van Veenendaal, G D Valk, M R Vriens, M E T Tesselaar, J G van den Berg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epigenetic regulation of SSTFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Systematic Evaluation of the Immune Environment of Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  9. CD3Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K G SamsomDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L M van VeenendaalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
G D ValkDepartment of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M R VriensDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M E T TesselaarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J G van den BergDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall-intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumours. In recent years, basic research in SI-NETs has attempted to unravel the molecular events underlying SI-NET tumorigenesis.

aimWe aim to provide an overview of the current literature regarding prognostic and predictive molecular factors in patients with SI-NETs.

methodA PubMed search was conducted on (epi)genetic prognostic factors in SI-NETs from 2000 until 2019.

resultsThe search yielded 1522 articles of which 20 reviews and 35 original studies were selected for further evaluation. SI-NETs are mutationally quiet tumours with a different genetic make-up compared to pancreatic NETs. Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 18 is the most frequent genomic aberration (44-100%) followed by mutations of CDKN1B in 8%. Prognostic analyses were performed in 16 studies, of which 8 found a significant (epi)genetic association for survival or progression. Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 18, gains of chromosome 4, 5, 7, 14 and 20p, copy gain of the SRC gene and low expression of RASSF1A and P16 were associated with poorer survival. In comparison with genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations are significantly more common in SI-NETs and may represent more promising targets in the treatment of SI-NETs.

conclusionSI-NETs are mutationally silent tumours. No biomarkers have been identified yet that can easily be adopted into current clinical decision making. SI-NETs may represent a heterogeneous disease and larger international studies are warranted to translate molecular findings into precision oncology.

Indexed as

carcinoidepigeneticsgeneticsneuroendocrine tumoursprognosissmall intestinalsurvival

Identifiers

PMID31189127
PMCPMC6599083
OpenAlexW2950460737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.